Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Jan;47(1):169-76.
doi: 10.1002/hep.21945.

A pilot project examining the predicted preferences of patients and physicians in the primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A pilot project examining the predicted preferences of patients and physicians in the primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage

Anna V Longacre et al. Hepatology. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and nonselective beta-blockers (hereafter just called beta-blockers) are both effective for primary prophylaxis for variceal hemorrhage; however, the route of administration and side effects of these treatments are distinct. The objective of this study was to examine predicted preferences of patients and physicians for the primary prevention of variceal hemorrhage. Untreated patients with newly diagnosed esophageal varices and practicing gastroenterologists were enrolled in this study. Patients with contraindications to either EVL or beta-blockers were excluded. Predicted preferences for treatment were evaluated with an interactive computer task designed to elicit subjects' trade-offs related to the route of administration, risk of fatigue, sexual dysfunction, dysphagia, shortness of breath and/or hypotension, procedure-related bleeding, and perforation. Fifty-three patients and 61 physicians were enrolled. Thirty-four (64%) patients and 35 (57%) physicians preferred EVL over beta-blockers. Patients' predicted preferences were most strongly influenced by the risks of shortness of breath or hypotension, fatigue, and procedure-related bleeding, whereas physicians placed greater importance on procedure-related bleeding, sexual dysfunction, and perforation. Forty-eight patients were prescribed beta-blockers, two were not given prophylaxis, and three were lost to follow-up.

Conclusion: Predicted treatment preferences among both patients and physicians for primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage vary significantly. Physicians in this study preferring EVL stated that they prescribe beta-blockers as first-line therapy in order to remain compliant with guidelines. Physicians should discuss both EVL and beta-blockers with patients requiring primary prophylaxis for variceal hemorrhage. Future guidelines should incorporate individual patient preferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adaptive Conjoint Analysis Trade-Off Rating Example.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of Adaptive Conjoint Analysis Handout Demonstrating Relative Importance of Each Treatment Characteristic.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of Patient and Physicians Preferences for Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

References

    1. Grace ND, Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Burroughs AK, Pagliaro L, Makuch RW, et al. Portal hypertension and variceal bleeding: An AASLD single topic symposium. Hepatology. 1998;28:868–880. - PubMed
    1. Imperiale TF, Chalasani N. A meta-analysis of endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding. Hepatology. 2001;33:802–807. - PubMed
    1. DAmico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: an evidence-based approach. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19:475–505. - PubMed
    1. Chen W, Nikolova D, Frederiksen S, Gluund C. Beta-blockers reduce mortality in cirrhotic patients with oesophageal varices who have never bled. J Hepatol. 2004:40. - PubMed
    1. Khuroo MS, Khuroo NS, Farahat KLC, Khuroo YS, Sofi AA, Dahab ST. Meta-analysis: endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21:347–361. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances