Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct 14:7:37.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-37.

Medical school faculty discontent: prevalence and predictors of intent to leave academic careers

Affiliations

Medical school faculty discontent: prevalence and predictors of intent to leave academic careers

Steven R Lowenstein et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Medical school faculty are less enthusiastic about their academic careers than ever before. In this study, we measured the prevalence and determinants of intent to leave academic medicine.

Methods: A 75-question survey was administered to faculty at a School of Medicine. Questions addressed quality of life, faculty responsibilities, support for teaching, clinical work and scholarship, mentoring and participation in governance.

Results: Of 1,408 eligible faculty members, 532 (38%) participated. Among respondents, 224 (40%; CI95: 0.35, 0.44) reported that their careers were not progressing satisfactorily; 236 (42%; CI95: 0.38, 0.46) were "seriously considering leaving academic medicine in the next five years." Members of clinical departments (OR = 1.71; CI95: 1.01, 2.91) were more likely to consider leaving; members of inter-disciplinary centers were less likely (OR = 0.68; CI95: 0.47, 0.98). The predictors of "serious intent to leave" included: Difficulties balancing work and family (OR = 3.52; CI95: 2.34, 5.30); inability to comment on performance of institutional leaders (OR = 3.08; CI95: 2.07, 4.72); absence of faculty development programs (OR = 3.03; CI95: 2.00, 4.60); lack of recognition of clinical work (OR = 2.73; CI95: 1.60, 4.68) and teaching (OR = 2.47; CI95: 1.59, 3.83) in promotion evaluations; absence of "academic community" (OR = 2.67; CI95: 1.86, 3.83); and failure of chairs to evaluate academic progress regularly (OR = 2.60; CI95: 1.80, 3.74).

Conclusion: Faculty are a medical school's key resource, but 42 percent are seriously considering leaving. Medical schools should refocus faculty retention efforts on professional development programs, regular performance feedback, balancing career and family, tangible recognition of teaching and clinical service and meaningful faculty participation in institutional governance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carr P, Bickel J, Inui TS. Taking root in a forest clearing: A resource guide for medical faculty. Boston: Boston University School of Medicine; 2004.
    1. Lundmerer KM. Time to heal. American medical education from the turn of the century to the era of managed care. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
    1. Bland CJ, Seaquist E, Pacala JT, Center B, Finstad D. One school's strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty. Acad Med. 2002;77:368–376. - PubMed
    1. Thomas PA, Diener-West M, Canto MI, Martin DR, Post WS, Streiff MB. Results of an academic promotion and career path survey of faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2004;79:258–264. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200403000-00013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lowenstein SR, Harvan RA. Broadening the definition of scholarship: A strategy to recognize and reward clinician-educators at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. In: O'Meara KA, Rice RE, editor. Faculty priorities revisited: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons; 2005.

LinkOut - more resources