Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation?
- PMID: 17937970
- DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.06.003
Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation?
Abstract
It has been suggested that the observation of another person's action affects the behavior of the observer because the observation of action leads to the excitation of similar response codes in the observer. It is unknown, however, if one must witness the action or if it is sufficient for one to believe that the other agent is responding for response co-representation to occur. To this end, participants in the present study performed a joint spatial-compatibility task with a confederate when: (1) the confederate sat beside the participant; and, (2) the confederate left the room and told the participant that they would continue to perform their component of the task on a networked computer in another room. Even though participants believed that the confederate performed the task in another room, joint spatial-compatibility was only observed when the confederate was present. These results reveal that the actions of another person may only be represented by the observer when the observer is able to witness a portion of the action.
Similar articles
-
Action co-representation is tuned to other humans.J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Nov;20(11):2015-24. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20144. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18416679
-
The performance and observation of action shape future behaviour.Brain Cogn. 2009 Nov;71(2):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Apr 29. Brain Cogn. 2009. PMID: 19406547
-
Out of your sight, out of my mind: Knowledge about another person's visual access modulates spontaneous visuospatial perspective-taking.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jun;43(6):1065-1072. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000379. Epub 2017 Mar 6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017. PMID: 28263631
-
Spatial choices of macaque monkeys based on the visual representation of the response space: rotation of the stimuli.Behav Brain Res. 2008 Nov 21;193(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.05.019. Epub 2008 Jun 4. Behav Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18588916
-
"Seeing is believing": myth or maxim? Mimics of pathology on paediatric chest imaging studies.Breathe (Sheff). 2023 Sep;19(3):230049. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0049-2023. Epub 2023 Sep 12. Breathe (Sheff). 2023. PMID: 37719238 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0664-y. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Psychol Res. 2016. PMID: 25833374
-
Primary and submovement control of aiming in C6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jul 23;11:112. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-112. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 25055852 Free PMC article.
-
Co-representation breaks down beyond the dyad in UK adults.PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0318545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318545. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39999116 Free PMC article.
-
"Two Minds Don't Blink Alike": The Attentional Blink Does Not Occur in a Joint Context.Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 12;9:1714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01714. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30258390 Free PMC article.
-
Bimanual joint action: correlated timing or "bimanual" movements accomplished by two people.Exp Brain Res. 2018 Aug;236(8):2363-2375. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5306-3. Epub 2018 Jun 11. Exp Brain Res. 2018. PMID: 29947956
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials