Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Oct;28(5):347-53.
doi: 10.1007/s10792-007-9149-3. Epub 2007 Oct 16.

The association of office intraocular pressure fluctuation in ocular hypertension with frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormality

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The association of office intraocular pressure fluctuation in ocular hypertension with frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormality

Volkan Dayanir et al. Int Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of ocular hypertension (OHT) patients with and without frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry test abnormalities.

Patients and methods: In this prospective, observational, cross-sectional, comparative case series, one eye of 33 OHT patients was randomly chosen. All OHT patients had IOP > or = 23 mmHg in 2 out of 3 measurements on the test day, normal appearing discs and nerve fiber layer, and normal white on white standard automated perimetry (SAP). Several IOP calculations (outpatient IOP, highest office IOP, mean office IOP, office IOP fluctuation, and office IOP peak), CCT, SAP and FDT parameters were compared between OHT patients with repeatable FDT perimetry abnormality and normal FDT perimetry.

Results: Eight (24%) of 33 OHT patients had an abnormal FDT perimetry test. The median office IOP fluctuation (5.0 vs 2.0, P = 0.007), office IOP peak (3.2 vs 1.0, P = 0.004), and FDT pattern standard deviation (PSD) (5.03 v 3.32, P = 0.000) were significantly higher in OHT patients with repeatable FDT perimetry test abnormalities compared to OHT patients with normal FDT perimetry test. Office IOP fluctuation and office IOP peak were significantly correlated with both number of significantly depressed FDT points and FDT PSD index. CCT measurements and SAP global indices did not differ significantly in OHT patients with and without FDT perimetry test abnormality.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that currently diagnosed OHT patients who have large office IOP fluctuations and office IOP peaks are more likely to have repeatable FDT perimetry test abnormalities. These results suggest that OHT patients with large IOP fluctuations and IOP peaks are more likely to have early glaucomatous damage, and this should be taken into account when assessing the risk of conversion to primary open angle glaucoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;134(4):529-37 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar;129(3):323-7 - PubMed
    1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;240(8):658-65 - PubMed
    1. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;28(4):248-52 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Feb;43(2):398-401 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources