Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy
- PMID: 17939004
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9441-3
Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy
Abstract
Background: Esophagectomy is a technically demanding operation with high procedure-related morbidity and mortality rates. Minimally invasive techniques were introduced in the late 1980s in an effort to decrease the invasiveness of the procedure. Data concerning the use of robotic systems for esophageal cancer are scarce in the literature. The goal of this report is to describe the authors' early experience using robotically assisted technology to perform transhiatal esophagectomy (RATE).
Methods: Between September 2001 and May 2004, 18 patients underwent RATE at the authors' institution. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed. Gender, age, postoperative diagnosis, operative time, conversion rate, blood loss, hospital stay, length of the follow-up period, and complications were assessed.
Results: At the authors' institution, 18 patients underwent RATE, including 16 men (89%), with a mean age of 54 years (range, 41-73 years). The RATE procedure was completed for all 18 patients (100%). The mean operative time was 267 +/- 71 min, and estimated blood loss was 54 ml (range, 10-150 ml). The mean intensive care unit stay was 1.8 days (range, 1-5 days), and the mean hospital stay was 10 days (range, 4-38 days). A total of 12 perioperative complications occurred for 9 patients, including 6 anastomotic leaks, 1 thoracic duct injury, 1 vocal cord paralysis, 1 pleural effusion, and 2 atrial fibrillations. Anastomotic stricture was observed in six patients. There were no perioperative deaths. Pathologic examination of the surgical specimen yielded an average of 14 lymph nodes per patient (range, 7-27). During the mean follow-up period of 22 +/- 8 months, 2 patients died, 2 were lost to follow-up evaluation, 3 had recurrence, and 11 were disease free.
Conclusion: The current study shows that RATE, with its decreased blood loss, minimal cardiopulmonary complications, and no hospital mortality, represents a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Comment in
-
Transhiatal robot-assisted esophagectomy.Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):1139-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9798-y. Epub 2008 Feb 23. Surg Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18297350 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6. Dis Esophagus. 2013. PMID: 22394116 Clinical Trial.
-
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9697-7. Epub 2007 Dec 11. Surg Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18071806
-
Transhiatal robot-assisted esophagectomy.Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):1139-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9798-y. Epub 2008 Feb 23. Surg Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18297350 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.12.004. Am J Surg. 2005. PMID: 15972176 Review.
-
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Int J Med Robot. 2019 Jun;15(3):e1988. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1988. Epub 2019 Feb 22. Int J Med Robot. 2019. PMID: 30737881
Cited by
-
Contribution of robotics to minimally invasive esophagectomy.J Robot Surg. 2013 Dec;7(4):325-32. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0391-y. Epub 2013 Jan 24. J Robot Surg. 2013. PMID: 27001870
-
European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):253-88. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3916-9. Epub 2014 Nov 8. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25380708
-
Robotic surgery for esophageal cancer: Merits and demerits.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017 Aug 14;1(3):193-198. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12028. eCollection 2017 Sep. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017. PMID: 29863149 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.Dis Esophagus. 2016 Jul;29(5):429-34. doi: 10.1111/dote.12345. Epub 2015 Mar 23. Dis Esophagus. 2016. PMID: 25809390 Free PMC article.
-
Oncologic Resection in Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy.JSLS. 2019 Apr-Jun;23(2):e2019.00017. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00017. JSLS. 2019. PMID: 31148912 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
