Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;22(12):1681-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0396-9. Epub 2007 Oct 16.

Barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of colorectal cancer screening

Affiliations

Barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of colorectal cancer screening

Carmen E Guerra et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) has been demonstrated to be effective and is consistently recommended by clinical practice guidelines. However, only slightly over half of all Americans have ever been screened. Patients cite physician recommendation as the most important motivator of screening. This study explored the barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of CRCS.

Methods: A 3-component qualitative study to explore the barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of CRCS: in-depth, semistructured interviews with 29 purposively sampled, community- and academic-based primary care physicians; chart-stimulated recall, a technique that utilizes patient charts to probe physician recall and provide context about the barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of CRCS during actual clinic encounters; and focus groups with 18 academic primary care physicians. Grounded theory techniques of analysis were used.

Results: All the participating physicians were aware of and recommended CRCS. The overwhelmingly preferred test was colonoscopy. Barriers of physician recommendation of CRCS included patient comorbidities, prior patient refusal of screening, physician forgetfulness, acute care visits, lack of time, and lack of reminder systems and test tracking systems. Facilitators to physician recommendation of CRCS included patient request, patient age 50-59, physician positive attitudes about CRCS, physician prioritization of screening, visits devoted to preventive health, reminders, and incentives.

Conclusion: There are multiple physician, patient, and system barriers to recommending CRCS. Thus, interventions may need to target barriers at multiple levels to successfully increase physician recommendation of CRCS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17237035', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17237035/'}]}
    2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:43–66. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '14974763', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14974763/'}]}
    2. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:41–52. - PubMed
    1. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003:544–60. - PubMed
    1. Pignone M, Levin B. Recent developments in colorectal cancer screening and prevention. Am Fam Physician. 2002:297–302. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12118972', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12118972/'}]}
    2. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):132–41. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms