Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with the Bicontact revision stem
- PMID: 17939095
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-965657
Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with the Bicontact revision stem
Abstract
Purpose: Periprosthetic fractures in cases without prior loosening of the stem can be treated with open reduction and internal fixation, but cases with preexisting loosening and/or bone defects present specific challenges to the surgeon. The keys to the success of intramedullary stabilization of femoral fractures--reconstruction of length, axis and rotation rather than meticulous reduction of the fragments and minimal impact on fragment vascularization by the surgical approach--can be transferred to the treatment of periprosthetic fractures.
Method: The Bicontact revision stem can be regarded as a combination of an interlocking nail in its distal part and a proximally coated femoral stem in its proximal part. The transfemoral approach respects the vascularization of the bone, although it is not minimally invasive. Forty-one patients with a mean age of 72.3 years and a periprosthetic fracture were included in this study. According to the Vancouver classification there were 2 type A fractures of the trochanteric region, 14 were B1, 8 were B2 with prior loosening, 13 were B3 with significant bone loss, and 2 fractures were distal to the tip of the prosthesis (type C).
Results: In all patients, intramedullary stabilization with a Bicontact revision stem was performed. All but three fractures healed (pathologic fracture with multiple myeloma in one case, impaired bone healing in two cases). In 7 patients, further procedures had to be undertaken (new periprosthetic fracture in 2, loosening and revision with a standard prosthesis in 2, revision with a long stem prosthesis together with bone grafting in 3 cases). At follow-up, after a mean of 4.3 years, all patients were able to walk, and the mean Harris Hip Score was 71.1 points.
Conclusion: In conclusion, combined application of the principles of intramedullary nailing and of uncemented total hip replacement by use of the distally interlocked Bicontact revision stem enables successful treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Similar articles
-
Intramedullary stabilization of periprosthetic fractures of the femur taking special account of bone defects.Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2006 Oct;18(4):341-63. doi: 10.1007/s00064-006-1182-2. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2006. PMID: 17103132 English, German.
-
Treatment of large femoral bone defects--15-year experiences with the cementless Bicontact revision stem with distal interlocking.Z Orthop Unfall. 2007 Sep-Oct;145 Suppl 1:S34-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965658. Z Orthop Unfall. 2007. PMID: 17939097
-
[Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(1):52-58. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017. PMID: 28253947 Czech.
-
A prospective, modernized treatment protocol for periprosthetic femur fractures.Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Oct;35(4):485-92, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.05.001. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004. PMID: 15363923 Review.
-
Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 19. Injury. 2015. PMID: 25085599 Review.
Cited by
-
Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem: overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls.Ann Transl Med. 2015 Sep;3(16):234. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.09.32. Ann Transl Med. 2015. PMID: 26539451 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mid-term results of a cementless hip stem in femoral revision: how much diaphyseal press-fit do we need?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Apr;144(4):1813-1820. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05191-4. Epub 2024 Jan 13. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 38217640 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical