Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Nov;100(5):991-8.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm180.

Domestication and crop physiology: roots of green-revolution wheat

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Domestication and crop physiology: roots of green-revolution wheat

J Giles Waines et al. Ann Bot. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Background and aims: Most plant scientists, in contrast to animal scientists, study only half the organism, namely above-ground stems, leaves, flowers and fruits, and neglect below-ground roots. Yet all acknowledge roots are important for anchorage, water and nutrient uptake, and presumably components of yield. This paper investigates the relationship between domestication, and the root systems of landraces, and the parents of early, mid- and late green-revolution bread wheat cultivars. It compares the root system of bread wheat and 'Veery'-type wheat containing the 1RS translocation from rye.

Methods: Wheat germplasm was grown in large pots in sand culture in replicated experiments. This allowed roots to be washed free to study root characters.

Key results: The three bread wheat parents of early green-revolution wheats have root biomass less than two-thirds the mean of some landrace wheats. Crossing early green-revolution wheat to an F(2) of 'Norin 10' and 'Brevor', further reduced root biomass in mid-generation semi-dwarf and dwarf wheats. Later-generation semi-dwarf wheats show genetic variation for root biomass, but some exhibit further reduction in root size. This is so for some California and UK wheats. The wheat-rye translocation in 'Kavkaz' for the short arm of chromosome 1 (1RS) increased root biomass and branching in cultivars that contained it.

Conclusions: Root size of modern cultivars is small compared with that of landraces. Their root system may be too small for optimum uptake of water and nutrients and maximum grain yield. Optimum root size for grain yield has not been investigated in wheat or most crop plants. Use of 1RS and similar alien translocations may increase root biomass and grain yield significantly in irrigated and rain-fed conditions. Root characters may be integrated into components of yield analysis in wheat. Plant breeders may need to select directly for root characters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>ig</sc>. 1.
Fig. 1.
Root biomass of green-revolution bread wheat ‘Pavon 76’ and its near isogenic rye 1RS translocation lines ‘Pavon 1RS.1AL’, ‘Pavon 1RS.1BL’ and ‘Pavon 1RS.1DL’ grown under well-watered (wet) and drought-stressed (dry) pot sand-culture conditions in a cooled glasshouse.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bazzaz FA, Ackerly DD, Reekie EG. Reproductive allocation in plants. In: Fenner M, editor. Seeds: the ecology and regeneration of plant communities. 2nd edn. Wallingford: CAB International; 2000. pp. 1–29.
    1. Borlaug NE. Wheat breeding and its impact on world food supply. In: Finlay KW, Shepherd KW, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Wheat Genetics Symposium. Canberra. Sydney: Australian Academy of Sciences/Butterworths; 1968. pp. 1–36.
    1. Crowley NA, Uphause J, Ohm H. Agronomy Abstracts 8–5. Salt Lake City, UT, USA: 2005. Wheat lines with different root volume. 6 November.
    1. Crowley NA, Uphause J, Ohm H. Agronomy Abstracts 10–4. Indianapolis, IN, USA: 2006. Identification of wheat genotypes with large root volume to potentially increase drought tolerance. 12 November.
    1. Donald CM. The design of wheat ideotypes. In: Finlay KW, Shepherd KW, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Wheat Genetics Symposium. Sydney, Australia: Butterworths; 1968. pp. 377–387.

Publication types