Healthcare without conscience--unconscionable!
- PMID: 17940123
- DOI: 10.1345/aph.1K312
Healthcare without conscience--unconscionable!
Abstract
The American public and government response to media reports of pharmacists refusing to fill prescriptions due to moral objections could fundamentally alter health care. Denying one group of citizens the right to act on their conscience puts each citizen in jeopardy of losing First Amendment rights. Denying healthcare professionals the right to act on their conscience puts patients at risk of being cared for by those who are less than professional, those whose character attributes essential to quality care are compromised. We can define better solutions for access to legal prescriptions and therapies without demanding that healthcare professionals become complicit in activities they deem immoral.
Similar articles
-
Refusals by pharmacists to dispense emergency contraception: a critique.Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;107(5):1148-51. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000214951.46283.40. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16648422
-
Pharmacist conscience clauses and access to oral contraceptives.J Med Ethics. 2008 Jul;34(7):517-20. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021337. J Med Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18591285 Review.
-
Professional right of conscience.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008 Sep-Oct;53(5):406-12; quiz 487-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.05.009. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008. PMID: 18761293
-
Public health. Conscientious objection and the pharmacist.Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1558-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1114371. Science. 2005. PMID: 15947160 No abstract available.
-
An essential prescription: why pharmacist-inclusive conscience clauses are necessary.J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2006 Spring;22(2):349-82. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2006. PMID: 17117701 Review. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources