Genomic imprinting, growth control and the allocation of nutritional resources: consequences for postnatal life
- PMID: 17940412
- DOI: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328013daa2
Genomic imprinting, growth control and the allocation of nutritional resources: consequences for postnatal life
Abstract
Purpose of review: Genes subject to genomic imprinting are predominantly expressed from one of the two parental chromosomes, are often clustered in the genome, and their activity and repression are epigenetically regulated. The role of imprinted genes in growth control has been apparent since the discovery of imprinting in the early 1980s.
Recent findings: Drawing from studies in the mouse, we propose three distinct classes of imprinted genes - those expressed, imprinted and acting predominantly within the placenta, those with no associated foetal growth effects that act postnatally to regulate metabolic processes, and those expressed in the embryo and placenta that programme the development of organs participating in metabolic processes. Members of this latter class may interact in functional networks regulating the interaction between the mother and the foetus, affecting generalized foetal well-being, growth and organ development; they may also coordinately regulate the development of particular organ systems.
Summary: The mono-allelic behaviour and sensitivity to changes in regional epigenetic states renders imprinted genes adaptable and vulnerable; in all cases, their perturbed dosage can compromise prenatal and/or postnatal control of nutritional resources. This finding has implications for understanding the relationships between prenatal events and diseases later in life.
Similar articles
-
In-utero stress and mode of conception: impact on regulation of imprinted genes, fetal development and future health.Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Nov 5;25(6):777-801. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz025. Hum Reprod Update. 2019. PMID: 31633761
-
Genomic imprinting, growth and maternal-fetal interactions.J Exp Biol. 2018 Mar 7;221(Pt Suppl 1):jeb164517. doi: 10.1242/jeb.164517. J Exp Biol. 2018. PMID: 29514882 Review.
-
Epigenetically regulated imprinted genes and foetal programming.Neurotox Res. 2010 Nov;18(3-4):386-92. doi: 10.1007/s12640-010-9169-z. Epub 2010 Mar 23. Neurotox Res. 2010. PMID: 20309665 Review.
-
Imprinting of the mouse Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island.Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998 May 25;140(1-2):9-14. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(98)00022-7. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998. PMID: 9722161 Review.
-
The effects of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on genomic imprinting in the placenta.Placenta. 2019 Sep 1;84:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Mar 4. Placenta. 2019. PMID: 30871810 Review.
Cited by
-
Specific changes in the expression of imprinted genes in prostate cancer--implications for cancer progression and epigenetic regulation.Asian J Androl. 2012 May;14(3):436-50. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.160. Epub 2012 Feb 27. Asian J Androl. 2012. PMID: 22367183 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endocrine disruptors, environmental oxygen, epigenetics and pregnancy.Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2011 Jan 1;3(2):690-700. doi: 10.2741/e279. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2011. PMID: 21196344 Free PMC article. Review.
-
DNA methylation at differentially methylated regions of imprinted genes is resistant to developmental programming by maternal nutrition.Epigenetics. 2012 Oct;7(10):1200-10. doi: 10.4161/epi.22141. Epub 2012 Sep 11. Epigenetics. 2012. PMID: 22968513 Free PMC article.
-
An unbiased assessment of the role of imprinted genes in an intergenerational model of developmental programming.PLoS Genet. 2012;8(4):e1002605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002605. Epub 2012 Apr 12. PLoS Genet. 2012. PMID: 22511876 Free PMC article.
-
Spatiotemporal expression pattern of Mirg, an imprinted non-coding gene, during mouse embryogenesis.J Mol Histol. 2012 Feb;43(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10735-011-9367-x. Epub 2011 Oct 29. J Mol Histol. 2012. PMID: 22033866
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials