Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Jul;16(7):847-52.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0339-3. Epub 2007 Oct 17.

Prophylactic anti-coagulation in cancer palliative care: a prospective randomised study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prophylactic anti-coagulation in cancer palliative care: a prospective randomised study

Catherine Weber et al. Support Care Cancer. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

Goals: The objective of this study was to determine utility of prophylactic anti-coagulation in cancer patients hospitalised for palliative care in a specialised centre.

Materials and methods: Prospective 1:1 open randomised study was designed. Twenty patients aged 55 to 88 years with advanced cancer and an estimated life expectancy of less than 6 months were assigned to either receive treatment with 2,850/3,800 U (<70/>70 kg) of daily subcutaneous nadroparin or no treatment. Suspicion of venous thrombo-embolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) was confirmed by echo-Doppler examination of the lower limbs and/or by spiral computed tomography scan of the lungs. Bleeding episodes were recorded. Platelet count was measured on days 7 and 14. Survival time from study entry was determined.

Main results: One venous thrombo-embolism and one major bleeding occurred in the group receiving nadroparin, whereas two minor bleedings occurred in the control group. At 3 months, nine of ten participants had died in the control group vs five of ten in the group receiving nadroparin (P = 0.141). Five participants could be discharged home (P = 0.141).

Conclusions: Decision to administer prophylactic nadroparin in hospitalised cancer patients under palliative care remains a challenge. Better mobility score at admission and the likelihood to be discharged home may be useful for practical purposes. The observation of a potential influence of prophylactic nadroparin on survival deserves further studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992 May;7(4):192-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1991 Feb;9(2):286-94 - PubMed
    1. J Palliat Med. 2002 Oct;5(5):729-37 - PubMed
    1. CMAJ. 1998 Jun 30;158(13):1717-26 - PubMed
    1. Clin Radiol. 1987 Jan;38(1):95-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources