Growth and change in the physician assistant workforce in the United States, 1967-2000
- PMID: 17941405
Growth and change in the physician assistant workforce in the United States, 1967-2000
Abstract
The physician assistant (PA) profession grew rapidly in the 1970s and 1990s. As acceptance of PAs in the health care system increased, roles for PAs in specialty care took shape and the scope of PA practice became more clearly defined. This report describes key elements of change in the demography and distribution of the PA population between 1967 and 2000, as well as the spread of PA training programs. Individual-level data from the American Academy of Physician Assistants, supplemented with county-level aggregate data from the Area Resource File, were used to describe the emergence of the PA profession between 1967 and 2000. Data on 49,641 PAs who had completed training by 2000 were analyzed. More than half (52.4%) of PAs active in 2000 were women. PA participation in the rural workforce remains high, with more than 18% of PAs practicing in rural settings, compared with about 20% in 1980. Primary care participation appears to have stabilized at about 47% among active PAs for whom specialty is known. By 2000, 51.5% of practicing PAs had been trained in the states where they worked. The profession has grown rapidly; 56% of all PAs were trained between 1991 and 2000. In 2000, more than 42% of accredited PA programs offered a master's degree, compared to master's degree programs in 1986. Although many critical issues of scope of practice and patient and physician acceptance of PAs have been resolved, the PA profession remains young and continues to evolve. Whether the historical contribution of PAs to primary care for rural and underserved populations can be sustained in the face of increasing specialization and higher-level academic credentialing is not clear.
Similar articles
-
A rural-urban comparison of patterns of physician assistant practice.JAAPA. 2000 Jul;13(7):49-50, 56, 59 passim. JAAPA. 2000. PMID: 11521629
-
Physician assistant education in the United States.Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):882-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7c0c. Acad Med. 2007. PMID: 17726400
-
Predicting the degree of rurality of physician assistant practice location.Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1996 Spring;41(1):105-19. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1996. PMID: 10154617
-
Measuring primary care: the standard primary care year.Rural Remote Health. 2008 Jul-Sep;8(3):1009. Epub 2008 Sep 10. Rural Remote Health. 2008. PMID: 18785798 Review.
-
The profession in 2002 and beyond.JAAPA. 2002 Oct;15(10):7-8, 13-5. JAAPA. 2002. PMID: 12434491 Review.
Cited by
-
The contribution of physician assistants in primary care: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 18;13:223. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-223. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013. PMID: 23773235 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in state regulation of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, 2001 to 2010.Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Apr;72(2):200-19. doi: 10.1177/1077558714563763. Epub 2014 Dec 25. Med Care Res Rev. 2015. PMID: 25542195 Free PMC article.
-
The implementation of physicians assistant in a surgical ward improves continuity in daily clinical work and increases comprehensibility of nurses and physicians.Patient Saf Surg. 2022 Nov 7;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00344-7. Patient Saf Surg. 2022. PMID: 36345014 Free PMC article.
-
Continued rise in the use of mid-level providers in US emergency departments, 1993-2009.Int J Emerg Med. 2012 May 23;5(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-21. Int J Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22621709 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic Counseling Assistants: an Integral Piece of the Evolving Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Model.J Genet Couns. 2017 Aug;26(4):716-727. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0039-6. Epub 2016 Nov 10. J Genet Couns. 2017. PMID: 27832509
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials