Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized trial
- PMID: 17942510
- DOI: 10.1177/1352458507082358
Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized trial
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate feasibility and perform an explanatory analysis of the efficacy of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) in MS patients with severe walking disabilities (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 6.0-7.5) in a pilot trial.
Methods: Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing RAGT with conventional walking training (CWT) in a group of stable MS patients (n = 35) during an inpatient rehabilitation stay, 15 sessions over three weeks. All patients participated additionally in a multimodal rehabilitation program. The primary outcome measure was walking velocity and secondary measures were 6-min-walking distance, stride length and knee-extensor strength. All tests were performed by an external blinded assessor at baseline after three weeks and at follow-up after six months. Additionally, Extended Barthel Index (EBI) at entry and discharge was assessed (not blinded), and acceptance/convenience of RAGT rated by patients (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) was recorded.
Results: Nineteen patients were randomly allocated to RAGT and 16 patients to CWT. Groups were comparable at baseline. There were 5 drop-outs (2 related directly to treatment) in the RAGT group and 1 in the CWT group, leaving 14 RAGT patients and 15 CWT patients for final analysis. Acceptance and convenience of RAGT as rated by patients were high. Effect sizes were moderate to large, although not significant, for walking velocity (0.700, 95% CI -0.089 to 1.489), walking distance (0.401, 95% CI - 0.370 to 1.172) and knee-extensor strength (right: 1.105, 95% CI 0.278 to 1.932, left 0.650, 95% CI -0.135 to 1.436) favouring RAGT. Prepost within-group analysis revealed an increase of walking velocity, walking distance and knee-extensor strength in the RAGT group, whereas in CWT group only walking velocity was improved. In both groups outcome values returned to baseline at follow-up after six months (n = 23).
Conclusions: Robot-assisted gait training is feasible and may be an effective therapeutic option in MS patients with severe walking disabilities. Effect size calculation and prepost analysis suggest a higher benefit on walking velocity and knee-extensor strength by RAGT compared to CWT. Due to several limitations, however, our results should be regarded as preliminary. Post hoc power calculation showed that two groups of 106 patients are needed to demonstrate a significant moderate effect size of 0.4 after three weeks of RAGT. Thus, further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to investigate the impact of this new treatment option in MS patients.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized trial.Mult Scler. 2012 Jun;18(6):881-90. doi: 10.1177/1352458511431075. Epub 2011 Dec 6. Mult Scler. 2012. PMID: 22146609 Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic-assisted step training (lokomat) not superior to equal intensity of over-ground rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(3):212-21. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425923. Epub 2011 Dec 2. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012. PMID: 22140197 Clinical Trial.
-
Robot-assisted gait training in patients with Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 May;26(4):353-61. doi: 10.1177/1545968311424417. Epub 2012 Jan 18. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012. PMID: 22258155 Clinical Trial.
-
Over-ground walking or robot-assisted gait training in people with .multiple sclerosis: does the effect depend on baseline walking speed and disease related disabilities? A systematic review and meta-regression.BMC Neurol. 2019 May 8;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1321-7. BMC Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31068151 Free PMC article.
-
What is the impact of robotic rehabilitation on balance and gait outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis? A systematic review of randomized control trials.Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Apr;57(2):246-253. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06692-2. Epub 2021 Feb 4. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021. PMID: 33541044
Cited by
-
Increased gait variability during robot-assisted walking is accompanied by increased sensorimotor brain activity in healthy people.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Dec 27;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0636-3. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 31882008 Free PMC article.
-
Therapies for mobility disability in persons with multiple sclerosis.Expert Rev Neurother. 2018 Jun;18(6):493-502. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1478289. Epub 2018 May 30. Expert Rev Neurother. 2018. PMID: 29772185 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Association of C-Mill With Traditional Physical Therapy Rehabilitation in a Multiple Sclerosis Patient: A Case Report.Transl Med UniSa. 2024 Dec 4;26(2):138-144. doi: 10.37825/2239-9747.1061. eCollection 2024. Transl Med UniSa. 2024. PMID: 40171088 Free PMC article.
-
Current State and Future Prospects of EEG and fNIRS in Robot-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation: A Brief Review.Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 5;13:172. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00172. eCollection 2019. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31231200 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Wristful thinking: exploring the effects of robotic rehabilitation and cross-education for persons with multiple sclerosis.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jul 5;22(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01684-y. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 40618053 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical