Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 Dec;83(7):582-9.
doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.027516. Epub 2007 Oct 17.

Evaluating large-scale HIV prevention interventions: study design for an integrated mathematical modelling approach

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Evaluating large-scale HIV prevention interventions: study design for an integrated mathematical modelling approach

M-C Boily et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Background: There is an urgent need to evaluate HIV prevention interventions, thereby improving our understanding of what works, under what circumstances and what is cost effective.

Objectives: To describe an integrated mathematical evaluation framework designed to assess the population-level impact of large-scale HIV interventions and applied in the context of Avahan, the Indian AIDS Initiative, in southern India. The Avahan Initiative is a large-scale HIV prevention intervention, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which targets high-risk groups in selected districts of the six states most affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic (Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Nagaland and Manipur) and along the national highways.

Methods: One important component of the monitoring and evaluation of Avahan relies on an integrated mathematical framework that combines empirical biological and behavioural data from different subpopulations in the intervention areas, with the use of tailor-made transmission dynamics models embedded within a Bayesian framework.

Results: An overview of the Avahan Initiative and the objectives of the monitoring and evaluation of the intervention is given. The rationale for choosing this evaluation design compared with other possible designs is presented, and the different components of the evaluation framework are described and its advantages and challenges are discussed, with illustrated examples.

Conclusions: This is the first time such an approach has been applied on such a large scale. Lessons learnt from the CHARME project could help in the design of future evaluations of large-scale interventions in other settings, whereas the results of the evaluation will be of programmatic and public health relevance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bennett S, Boerma J T, Brugha R. Scaling up HIV/AIDS Evaluation. Lancet 200636779–82. - PubMed
    1. Bertozzi S, Padian N S, Wegbreit J.et al HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment. In: Disease control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edn. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB, et al, editors. New York: Oxford University Press 2006 - PubMed
    1. Chandrasekaran P, Dallabetta G, Loo V.et al India: the unfinished agenda. Lancet Infect Dis 20068508–521. - PubMed
    1. Solomon S, Chakraborty A, D'Souza Yepthomi R. A review of the HIV epidemic in India. AIDS Educ Prevent. 2004;16(Suppl A)155–169. - PubMed
    1. Moses S, Blanchard J F, Kang H.et alAIDS in South Asia: understanding and responding to a heterogeneous epidemic. World Bank report. Washington: World Bank, 200611315–77.

Publication types