Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients
- PMID: 17943284
- PMCID: PMC2899252
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0458-y
Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients
Abstract
The aim of this prospective matched-pair (age, sex, fracture type, residential status, and walking ability at fracture) study was to analyse the short-term outcome after Gamma nail (GN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, focusing especially on functional aspects (Standardised Audit of Hip Fractures in Europe [SAHFE] hip fracture follow-up forms), reoperations, and mortality. Both groups consisted of 134 patients. DHS and GN groups did not differ significantly with respect to location of residence at 4 months or returning to the prefracture dwelling (78% vs. 73%, P = 0.224). The change in walking ability at 4 months compared to prefracture situation was better in the DHS group (p = 0.042), although there was no difference in the change of use of walking aids. The frequency of reoperations during the first year was somewhat lower in the DHS group (8.2% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.318). Mortality was lower in the DHS group both at 4 months (6.0% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.061) and 12 months (14.9% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.044). Although walking ability was better and mortality lower in the DHS group, both methods are useful in the treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures.
Le but de cette étude prospective est de comparer et d’analyser le devenir à long terme des fractures du col fémoral traitées par clou Gamma (GN) ou par le vis plaque (DHS), notamment en ce qui concerne leurs aspects fonctionnels, les réinterventions et la mortalité. Deux groupes de 134 patients ont été comparés. Il n’y a pas de différence significative entre ces deux groupes à 4 mois en ce qui concerne le retour aux activités pré-opératoires (78% vs. 73%, P = 0.224) entre DHS et GN. Néanmoins, la marche à 4 mois est bien meilleure dans le groupe DHS (p = 0.042), il n’y a pas de différence en ce qui concerne l’utilisation d’aide à la marche, moins de réinterventions dans le groupe DHS (8,2% vs. 12,7%, p = 0.318), de même en ce qui concerne la mortalité (6,0% vs. 13,4%, p = 0.061) et à 12 mois (14,9% vs 23,9%, p = 0.044). Ces deux méthodes sont utiles dans le traitement des fractures cervico trochantériennes, néanmoins, l’amélioration de la marche et la mortalité sont bien meilleures dans le groupe GHS que dans le groupe clou gamma.
Similar articles
-
Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.J Orthop Trauma. 1998 May;12(4):241-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199805000-00005. J Orthop Trauma. 1998. PMID: 9619458 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. A comparison of the Gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw: short-term outcome in 58 patients.Int Orthop. 2007 Feb;31(1):65-70. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0088-9. Epub 2006 Apr 22. Int Orthop. 2007. PMID: 16633810 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation Vs. Proximal Femur Nail For Unstable Per-Trochanteric Fractures: A Comparative Analysis Of Outcomes And Complications.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):34-38. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2021. PMID: 33774951
-
Cephalo-medullary nailing versus dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilisation plate for the treatment of unstable per-trochanteric hip fractures: a meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02193-5. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 33430910 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Therapeutic possibilities in trochanteric fractures. Safe--fast--stable].Orthopade. 2000 Apr;29(4):294-301. doi: 10.1007/s001320050450. Orthopade. 2000. PMID: 10851690 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) with AO dynamic condylar screws (DCS) for the treatment for unstable peritrochanteric femoral fractures.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Apr;24(3):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1195-0. Epub 2013 Feb 27. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014. PMID: 23443746 Free PMC article.
-
Gamma nail versus percutaneous compression plate for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a multicenter pair-matched study.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Aug;33(6):2445-2452. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03441-6. Epub 2022 Dec 19. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 36534367
-
Preliminary experience with MEDGAL DHS for treatment of proximal femoral fractures.Acta Biomed. 2019 Dec 5;90(12-S):82-85. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8960. Acta Biomed. 2019. PMID: 31821289 Free PMC article.
-
Proximal femoral nail vs. dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis.Med Sci Monit. 2014 Sep 12;20:1628-33. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890962. Med Sci Monit. 2014. PMID: 25213190 Free PMC article.
-
[Evolution and principles of intramedullary locked nailing].Unfallchirurg. 2018 Mar;121(3):239-255. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0461-3. Unfallchirurg. 2018. PMID: 29464295 German.
References
-
- Bannister GC, Gibson AGF. Jewett nail plate or AO dynamic hip screw for trochanteric fractures? A randomised prospective controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1983;65:218.
-
- Bannister GC, Gibson AGF, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH. The fixation and prognosis of trochanteric fractures: a randomized prospective controlled trial. Clin Orthop. 1990;254:242–246. - PubMed
-
- Borgquist L, Ceder L, Thorngren KG. Function and social status 10 years after hip fracture. Prospective follow-up of 103 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;61:404–410. - PubMed
-
- Bridle Sh, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: a randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991;73:330–334. - PubMed
-
- Chapman MW, Bowman WE, Csongradi JJ, Day LJ, Trafton PG, Bovill EG. The use of Ender’s pins in extracapsular fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1981;63:14–28. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical