Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 May;22(5):1214-22.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9589-x. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation

Sanne M B I Botden et al. Surg Endosc. 2008 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies on the difference between physical, augmented and virtual reality (VR) simulation state that haptic feedback is an important feature in laparoscopic suturing simulation. Objective assessment is important to improve skills during training. This study focuses on the additive value of VR simulation for laparoscopic suturing training.

Methods: All participants of several European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)-approved laparoscopic skills courses (N = 45) filled out a questionnaire on their opinion on laparoscopic suturing training. Additionally, participants with little or no laparoscopic suturing experience were allotted to two groups: group A (N = 10), who started training on the box trainer and subsequently the VR simulator (SimSurgery), and group B (N = 10), who began on the VR simulator followed by the box. Finally, suturing and knot-tying skills were assessed by an expert observer, using a standard evaluation form (eight items on five-point-Likert scale). The same was done after the initial training on the box in group A, as a control. Significant differences were calculated with the independent-sample t-test and the paired t-test.

Results: The total score of group A was higher than both group B and control (means of 30.80, 27.60, 28.20, respectively), but not significantly. The only tendency to a significant difference between group A and B was found in 'taking proper bites' (mean 4.10 versus 3.60, p = 0.054). All the participants scored the features of the box trainer significantly higher than those of the VR simulator (p < 0.001), 46.7% was of the opinion that the box alone would be sufficient for laparoscopic suturing training.

Conclusion: From this study we can conclude that VR simulation does not have a significant additional value in laparoscopic suturing training, over traditional box trainers. One should consider that the future development in VR simulation should focus on basic skills and component tasks of procedural training in laparoscopic surgery, rather than laparoscopic suturing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1211-5 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):485-94 - PubMed
    1. Comput Aided Surg. 2004;9(5):227-34 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1158-64 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):130-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources