Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD001063.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001063.pub3.

Hands and knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior)

S Hunter  1 , G J Hofmeyr, R Kulier
Affiliations

Hands and knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior)

S Hunter et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Lateral and posterior position of the baby's head (the back of the baby's head facing to the mother's side or back) may be associated with more painful, prolonged or obstructed labour and difficult delivery. It is possible that certain positions adopted by the mother may influence the baby's position.

Objectives: To assess the effects of adopting a hands and knees maternal posture in late pregnancy or during labour when the presenting part of the fetus is in a lateral or posterior position compared with no intervention.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (July 2007) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2).

Selection criteria: Randomised trials of hands and knees maternal posture compared to other postures or controls.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors assessed trial eligibility and quality.

Main results: Three trials (2794 women) were included. In one trial (100 women), four different postures (four groups of 20 women) were combined for the comparison with the control group of 20 women. Lateral or posterior position of the presenting part of the fetus was less likely to persist following 10 minutes in the hands and knees position compared to a sitting position (one trial, 100 women, relative risk (RR) 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.38). In a second trial (2547 women), advice to assume the hands and knees posture for 10 minutes twice daily in the last weeks of pregnancy had no effect on the baby's position at delivery or any of the other pregnancy outcomes measured. The third trial studied the use of hands and knees position in labour and involved 147 labouring women at 37 or more weeks gestation. Occipito-posterior position of the baby was confirmed by ultrasound. Seventy women, who were randomised in the intervention group, assumed hands and knees positioning for a period of at least 30 minutes, compared to 77 women in the control group who did not assume hands and knees positioning in labour. The reduction in occipito-posterior or -transverse positions at delivery and operative deliveries were not statistically significant. There was a significant reduction in back pain.

Authors' conclusions: Use of hands and knees position for 10 minutes twice daily to correct occipito-posterior position of the fetus in late pregnancy cannot be recommended as an intervention. This is not to suggest that women should not adopt this position if they find it comfortable. The use of position in labour was associated with reduced backache. Further trials are needed to assess the effects on other labour outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Andrews 1983 {published data only}
    1. Andrews CM, Andrews EC. Nursing, maternal postures, and fetal position. Nursing Research 1983;32:336‐41. - PubMed
Kariminia 2004 {published data only}
    1. Karaminia A, Keogh J, Chamberlain M. The effect of hands and knees exercise on the incidence of OP position at birth. Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand 7th Annual Congress; 2003 March 9‐12; Tasmania, Australia. 2003.
    1. Kariminia A, Chamberlain ME, Keogh J, Shea A. Randomised controlled trial of effect of hands and knees posturing on incidence of occiput posterior position at birth. BMJ 2004;328:490. - PMC - PubMed
Stremler 2005 {published data only}
    1. Stremler R. The labour position trial: a randomized, controlled trial of hands and knees positioning for women labouring with a fetus in the occipitoposterior position [thesis]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2003.
    1. Stremler R, Hodnett E, Petryshen P, Stevens B, Weston J, Willan AR. Randomized controlled trial of hands‐and‐knees positioning for occipitoposterior position in labor. Birth 2005;32(4):243‐51. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Andrews 1981 {published data only}
    1. Andrews CM. Nursing intervention to change a malpositioned fetus. Advances in Nursing Science 1981;3:53‐66. - PubMed
Ou 1997 {published data only}
    1. Ou X, Chen X, Su J. Correction of occipito‐posterior position by maternal posture during the process of labor. Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi [Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology] 1997;32(6):329‐32. - PubMed
Wu 2001 {published data only}
    1. Wu X, Fan L, Wang Q. Correction of occipito‐posterior by maternal postures during the process of labour. Chung‐Hua Fu Chan Ko Tsa Chih 2001;36:468‐9. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Anonymous 1999 {published data only}
    1. Anonymous. Hands/knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for malposition (lateral or posterior) of the presenting part. Practising Midwife 1999;2:10‐1. - PubMed
Lu 2001 {published data only}
    1. Lu JX, Li HX, Shu BL. Clinical observation of lateral‐prostrate position preventing persistent OP/OT position. Journal of Nursing Science 2001;16(3):136‐7.
Mao 1996 {published data only}
    1. Mao Y, Shan JZ. A study on comprehensive prophylactic intervening in the delivery of persistent occipito‐posterior position. Current Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;5:126‐9.

Additional references

Andrews 2004
    1. Andrews CM, Andrews EC. Physical theory as a basis for successful rotation of fetal malpositions and conversion of fetal malpresentations. Biological Research for Nursing 2004;6:126‐40. - PubMed
Higgins 2006
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
RevMan 2003 [Computer program]
    1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 4.2 for Windows. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2003.

References to other published versions of this review

CDSR 1998
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. Hands/knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 2. - PubMed
CDSR 2005
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. Hands and knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. [Art. No.: CD001063. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001063.pub2] - PubMed
Hofmeyr 1995
    1. Hofmeyr GJ. Hands/knees posture in pregnancy for malposition of presenting part. [revised 04 October 1993]. In: Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP, Crowther C (eds.) Pregnancy and Childbirth Module. In: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database [database on disk and CDROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration; Issue 2, Oxford: Update Software; 1995.

Publication types