Aqueous drainage device surgery in refractory pediatric glaucoma: II. Ocular motility consequences
- PMID: 17945522
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.07.005
Aqueous drainage device surgery in refractory pediatric glaucoma: II. Ocular motility consequences
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the prevalence of complications relating to ocular motility and alignment in children with refractory congenital and aphakic glaucoma treated with aqueous drainage device surgery.
Methods: Chart review of consecutive children treated with aqueous drainage devices at Duke University Eye Center from 1995 to 2006 for ocular motility abnormalities and strabismus as well as sensorimotor testing results before and after aqueous drainage device placement.
Results: Thirty-eight eyes of 30 children with congenital glaucoma and 41 eyes of 32 children with aphakic glaucoma were included. Optotype visual acuity testing could be performed in a minority of children preoperatively. After aqueous drainage device surgery, 14 and 20 eyes, respectively, were >20/100 in the congenital glaucoma and aphakic glaucoma groups. Only a few children had stereopsis or demonstrated binocular function on Worth 4-Dot testing in both groups before and after aqueous drainage device surgery. Horizontal and vertical strabismus was common, especially after aqueous drainage device surgery and occurred in 57% of congenital glaucoma patients and 47% of aphakic glaucoma patients. Motility limitation (both vertical and horizontal) was also common and occurred in 37% overall.
Discussion: Ocular motility abnormalities and strabismus were common in children after aqueous drainage device surgery. These potential problems should be considered when aqueous drainage device surgery is planned, especially in children with binocularity.
Similar articles
-
Aqueous drainage device surgery in refractory pediatric glaucomas: I. Long-term outcomes.J AAPOS. 2008 Feb;12(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Oct 17. J AAPOS. 2008. PMID: 17942353
-
Risk factors for strabismus following glaucoma drainage device implantation for refractory childhood glaucoma.J AAPOS. 2019 Jun;23(3):145.e1-145.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 May 7. J AAPOS. 2019. PMID: 31075530
-
Strabismus surgery outcomes in eyes with glaucoma drainage devices.J AAPOS. 2017 Apr;21(2):103-106.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 9. J AAPOS. 2017. PMID: 28286307
-
Glaucoma drainage implants in pediatric patients.Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005 Sep;18(3):431-42, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ohc.2005.05.009. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005. PMID: 16055000 Review.
-
Mini-drainage devices: the Ex-PRESS Mini-Glaucoma Device.Dev Ophthalmol. 2012;50:90-5. doi: 10.1159/000334780. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Dev Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22517176 Review.
Cited by
-
Ahmed glaucoma valve implant for refractory glaucoma in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Prog. 2025 Jan-Mar;108(1):368504241301520. doi: 10.1177/00368504241301520. Sci Prog. 2025. PMID: 39840485 Free PMC article.
-
Glaucoma drainage devices in children: an updated review.Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2024 Apr 8;87(6):e2021. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.2021-0338. eCollection 2024. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2024. PMID: 38597522 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Glaucoma surgery in childhood].Ophthalmologe. 2011 Jul;108(7):618-23. doi: 10.1007/s00347-010-2292-7. Ophthalmologe. 2011. PMID: 21618019 Review. German.
-
Current surgical techniques for the management of pediatric glaucoma: A literature review.Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 22;3:1101281. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1101281. eCollection 2023. Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 38983044 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Glaucoma surgery in children].Ophthalmologe. 2015 Feb;112(2):95-101. doi: 10.1007/s00347-014-3052-x. Ophthalmologe. 2015. PMID: 25643652 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical