Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;177(3):1941-9.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.080077. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

Accelerated rate of gene gain and loss in primates

Affiliations

Accelerated rate of gene gain and loss in primates

Matthew W Hahn et al. Genetics. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

The molecular changes responsible for the evolution of modern humans have primarily been discussed in terms of individual nucleotide substitutions in regulatory or protein coding sequences. However, rates of nucleotide substitution are slowed in primates, and thus humans and chimpanzees are highly similar at the nucleotide level. We find that a third source of molecular evolution, gene gain and loss, is accelerated in primates relative to other mammals. Using a novel method that allows estimation of rate heterogeneity among lineages, we find that the rate of gene turnover in humans is more than 2.5 times faster than in other mammals and may be due to both mutational and selective forces. By reconciling the gene trees for all of the gene families included in the analysis, we are able to independently verify the numbers of inferred duplications. We also use two methods based on the genome assembly of rhesus macaque to further verify our results. Our analyses identify several gene families that have expanded or contracted more rapidly than is expected even after accounting for an overall rate acceleration in primates, including brain-related families that have more than doubled in size in humans. Many of the families showing large expansions also show evidence for positive selection on their nucleotide sequences, suggesting that selection has been important in shaping copy-number differences among mammals. These findings may help explain why humans and chimpanzees show high similarity between orthologous nucleotides yet great morphological and behavioral differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>igure</sc> 1.—
Figure 1.—
Rates of gene gain and loss across the mammals. The species tree of the six mammalian genomes considered is shown, shaded according to the estimated rates of gene gain and loss.
F<sc>igure</sc> 2.—
Figure 2.—
Rapidly evolving gene families. Individual families showing significantly accelerated rates of evolution along the human, chimpanzee, and macaque lineages are shown. Each row is a single gene family, with the relative rate of evolution along the human (red), chimpanzee (green), and macaque (blue) lineages given by the width of the colored bars. The size of the family in each of the three species is shown to the right; italicized numbers indicate significance in that lineage.
F<sc>igure</sc> 3.—
Figure 3.—
Gene tree for centaurin gamma. The relationships among the members of the centaurin gamma gene family are shown, including gene copies from human, chimpanzee, macaque, mouse, and rat. The numbers for each protein correspond to Ensembl protein identification numbers.

Similar articles

  • The evolution of mammalian gene families.
    Demuth JP, De Bie T, Stajich JE, Cristianini N, Hahn MW. Demuth JP, et al. PLoS One. 2006 Dec 20;1(1):e85. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000085. PLoS One. 2006. PMID: 17183716 Free PMC article.
  • Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome.
    Rhesus Macaque Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium; Gibbs RA, Rogers J, Katze MG, Bumgarner R, Weinstock GM, Mardis ER, Remington KA, Strausberg RL, Venter JC, Wilson RK, Batzer MA, Bustamante CD, Eichler EE, Hahn MW, Hardison RC, Makova KD, Miller W, Milosavljevic A, Palermo RE, Siepel A, Sikela JM, Attaway T, Bell S, Bernard KE, Buhay CJ, Chandrabose MN, Dao M, Davis C, Delehaunty KD, Ding Y, Dinh HH, Dugan-Rocha S, Fulton LA, Gabisi RA, Garner TT, Godfrey J, Hawes AC, Hernandez J, Hines S, Holder M, Hume J, Jhangiani SN, Joshi V, Khan ZM, Kirkness EF, Cree A, Fowler RG, Lee S, Lewis LR, Li Z, Liu YS, Moore SM, Muzny D, Nazareth LV, Ngo DN, Okwuonu GO, Pai G, Parker D, Paul HA, Pfannkoch C, Pohl CS, Rogers YH, Ruiz SJ, Sabo A, Santibanez J, Schneider BW, Smith SM, Sodergren E, Svatek AF, Utterback TR, Vattathil S, Warren W, White CS, Chinwalla AT, Feng Y, Halpern AL, Hillier LW, Huang X, Minx P, Nelson JO, Pepin KH, Qin X, Sutton GG, Venter E, Walenz BP, Wallis JW, Worley KC, Yang SP, Jones SM, Marra MA, Rocchi M, Schein JE, Baertsch R, Clarke L, Csürös M, Glasscock J, Harris RA, Havlak P, Jackson AR, Jiang H, Liu Y, Messina DN, Shen Y, Song HX, Wylie T, Zhang L, Birney E,… See abstract for full author list ➔ Rhesus Macaque Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium, et al. Science. 2007 Apr 13;316(5822):222-34. doi: 10.1126/science.1139247. Science. 2007. PMID: 17431167
  • Rapid evolution and copy number variation of primate RHOXF2, an X-linked homeobox gene involved in male reproduction and possibly brain function.
    Niu AL, Wang YQ, Zhang H, Liao CH, Wang JK, Zhang R, Che J, Su B. Niu AL, et al. BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Oct 12;11:298. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-298. BMC Evol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21988730 Free PMC article.
  • No accelerated evolution of 3'UTR region in human for brain-expressed genes.
    Li Y, Su B. Li Y, et al. Gene. 2006 Nov 15;383:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.06.024. Epub 2006 Jul 20. Gene. 2006. PMID: 16962257
  • Maximum likelihood methods for detecting adaptive evolution after gene duplication.
    Bielawski JP, Yang Z. Bielawski JP, et al. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2003;3(1-4):201-12. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2003. PMID: 12836699 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Adkins, R. M., A. H. Walton and R. L. Honeycutt, 2003. Higher-level systematics of rodents and divergence time estimates based on two congruent nuclear genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26: 409–420. - PubMed
    1. Bailey, J. A., Z. P. Gu, R. A. Clark, K. Reinert, R. V. Samonte et al., 2002. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science 297: 1003–1007. - PubMed
    1. Bailey, J. A., G. Liu and E. E. Eichler, 2003. An Alu transposition model for the origin and expansion of human segmental duplications. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73: 823–834. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey, J. A., A. M. Yavor, H. F. Massa, B. J. Trask and E. E. Eichler, 2001. Segmental duplications: Organization and impact within the current Human Genome Project assembly. Genome Res. 11: 1005–1017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birtle, Z., L. Goodstadt and C. P. Ponting, 2005. Duplication and positive selection among hominin-specific PRAME genes. BMC Genomics 6: 120. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types