Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr 5;147(3):320-5.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30600.

Perceptions of discrimination among persons who have undergone predictive testing for Huntington's disease

Affiliations

Perceptions of discrimination among persons who have undergone predictive testing for Huntington's disease

Elizabeth Penziner et al. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. .

Abstract

Potential discrimination from genetic testing may undermine technological advances for health care. Researching long-term consequences of testing for genetic conditions that may lead to discrimination is a public health priority. The consequences of genetic discrimination generate social, health, and economic burdens for society by diminishing opportunities for at-risk individuals in a range of contexts. The current study objective was to investigate perceptions of genetic stigmatization and discrimination among persons who completed predictive testing for Huntington's disease (HD). Using semi-structured interviews and computerized qualitative analysis, the perceptions of 15 presymptomatic persons with a positive gene test predicting HD were examined with regard to differential treatment following testing. The sample comprised 11 women and 4 men, mostly married (73%), aged between 22 and 62 years, with an average education of 14.6 years (SD +/- 2.57) and residing in urban, rural and suburban settings of eight U.S. States. Participants reported perceptions of consequences following disclosure of genetic test results in three areas: employment, insurance, and social relationships. Although most employed participants (90%) revealed their test results to their employers, nearly all reported they would not disclose this information to future employers. Most (87%) participants disclosed test results to their physician, but a similar majority (83%) did not tell their genetic status to insurers. Most participants (87%) disclosed test results to family and peers; patterns of disclosure varied widely. Discrimination concerns remain high in this sample and point to the need for more information to determine the extent and scope of the problem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Almqvist E, et al. Psychological consequences and predictors of adverse events in the first five years after predictive testing for Huntington's disease. Clinical Genetics. 1999;64(4):300–309. - PubMed
    1. Bailey DB, Skinner D, Sparkman KL. Discovering Fragile X Syndrome: Family experiences and perceptions. Pediatrics. 2003;11(2):407–416. - PubMed
    1. Barondes SH. Will genetics revolutionize psychiatry? The Harvard Mental Health Letter. 1998;15(5):4–6. - PubMed
    1. Billings PR, Kohn MA, de Cuevas M, Beckwith J, Alper JS, Natowicz MR. Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1992;50(3):476–482. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bird SJ. Genetic testing for neurologic diseases: A rose with thorns. Neurologic Clinics. 1989;7(4):859–870. - PubMed

Publication types