Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Nov;18(4):523-31.

Evaluation of the available anti-HCV antibody detection tests and RT-PCR assay in the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection

Affiliations
  • PMID: 17951937
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the available anti-HCV antibody detection tests and RT-PCR assay in the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection

Mohamed Amin A Tashkandy et al. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

The aim of the present work is to evaluate the commercially available antibody tests in the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection by comparing their results with the RT-PCR test. The study included 316 serum samples from three groups: blood donors, patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Samples were subjected to HCV-antibody detection by ELISA and RIBA tests and HCV-RNA detection by RT-PCR assay. The percentage of infectivity for blood donors was 18.9% by ELISA, 20.8% by RIBA and 23.6% by RT-PCR test. For patients on HD and those positive for HIV, the test positivity was respectively 59.3% and 5.3% by ELISA, 64% and 10.5% by RIBA and, 66.3% and 21% by PCR test. The percentage of false negativity of HCV-Ab by ELISA and RIBA when compared with RT-PCR test was 3.5 and 8.1% for samples blood donors, 17.1 and 25.7% for HD patients and 5.6 and 16.7% for HIV-infected samples, respectively. The false positivity of HCV-Ab by ELISA and RIBA, when compared with RT-PCR, was 5%, 3.9% and zero for blood donors, HD patients and HIV-HCV co-infected cases, respectively. While comparing ELISA with RT-PCR, the false positivity was 10%, 5.9% and zero respectively for blood donors, HD patients and HIV-HCV co-infected cases. Thus, it is very important to screen blood donors, HD patients and HIV-infected patients by using the RT-PCR for HCV-RNA to avoid false negative results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources