Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;84(5):1522-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.064.

Role of endothelin-1 receptor antagonists in vasoconstriction mediated by endothelin and other vasoconstrictors in human internal mammary artery

Affiliations

Role of endothelin-1 receptor antagonists in vasoconstriction mediated by endothelin and other vasoconstrictors in human internal mammary artery

Guo-Wei He et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The action of antagonists for endothelin type A (ET(A)) and type B (ET(B)) on the vasoconstriction mediated by various vasoconstrictors in the human bypass grafts have not been well-defined. We studied the role of antagonists for both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in vasoconstriction mediated by endothelin-1 and other vasoconstrictors in the human internal mammary artery (IMA).

Methods: Isolated IMA rings (n = 192, taken from 49 patients) were studied in organ bath for the interaction between endothelin-1, angiotensin II, U46619, and potassium chloride and the antagonist for ET(A) (BQ-123) or ET(B) (BQ-788).

Results: Significant relaxations were observed by BQ-123 (agonist: endothelin-1, 84.9 +/- 7.9%; angiotensin II, 45.5 +/- 5.1%; and U46619, 30.7 +/- 5.7%) or BQ-788 (agonist: endothelin-1, 66.5 +/- 11.3%; angiotensin II, 38.9 +/- 4.2%; and U46619, 30.8 +/- 4.0%), but not to potassium chloride-induced precontraction. Incubation of IMA with BQ-123 or BQ-123 + BQ-788 significantly shifted the concentration-contraction curve to endothelin-1 rightward (p < 0.05 vs control) with effective concentration causing 50% of maximal response (EC50) (-7.59 +/- 0.04 or -7.81 +/- 0.05 vs -8.47 +/- 0.05 log M in the control, p < 0.001), whereas BQ-788 alone did not affect the contraction curve (p = 1.0 vs control). In contrast, none of the endothelin-1 inhibitors and the combination demonstrated significant depression effects on angiotensin II, U46619, or potassium chloride-induced contraction.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the role of ET(A) and ET(B) antagonists in the endothelin-1-mediated contraction in the human IMA and indicates the dominant role of ET(A) receptors. Although these effects are specific to endothelin-1, cross-action between endothelin-1 and angiotensin II exists. These findings provide useful knowledge for the future development of the clinical antispastic protocol in coronary bypass surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources