Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2008 Mar;53(3):514-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.047. Epub 2007 Oct 15.

Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique

Affiliations
Case Reports

Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique

Craig G Rogers et al. Eur Urol. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy requires advanced training to accomplish tumor resection and renal reconstruction while minimizing warm ischemia times. Complex renal tumors add an additional challenge to a minimally invasive approach to nephron-sparing surgery. We describe our technique, illustrated with video, of robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors, including hilar, endophytic, and multiple tumors.

Methods: Robotic assistance was used to resect 14 tumors in eight patients (mean age: 50.3 yr; range: 30-68 yr). Three patients had hereditary kidney cancer. All patients had complex tumor features, including hilar tumors (n=5), endophytic tumors (n=4), and/or multiple tumors (n=3).

Results: Robotic partial nephrectomy procedures were performed successfully without complications. Hilar clamping was used with a mean warm ischemia time of 31 min (range: 24-45 min). Mean blood loss was 230 ml (range: 100-450 ml). Histopathology confirmed clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (n=3), hybrid oncocytic tumor (n=2), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (n=2), and oncocytoma (n=1). All patients had negative surgical margins. Mean index tumor size was 3.6 cm (range: 2.6-6.4 cm). Mean hospital stay was 2.6 d. At 3-mo follow-up, no patients experienced a statistically significant change in serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusions: Robotic partial nephrectomy is safe and feasible for select patients with complex renal tumors, including hilar, endophytic, and multiple tumors. Robotic assistance may facilitate a minimally invasive, nephron-sparing approach for select patients with complex renal tumors who might otherwise require open surgery or total nephrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Hilar tumor. CT demonstrates a 2.6 cm solid tumor located near the left renal vessels and abutting the renal pelvis.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Endophytic tumor. CT demonstrates a left 2.6 cm solid upper pole renal mass.
Fig 3
Fig 3
a. Multiple renal tumors. CT demonstrates two tumors in the mid/upper pole of the right kidney. b. Multiple renal tumors in the same patient. CT scan also demonstrates a right lower pole renal mass.
Fig 3
Fig 3
a. Multiple renal tumors. CT demonstrates two tumors in the mid/upper pole of the right kidney. b. Multiple renal tumors in the same patient. CT scan also demonstrates a right lower pole renal mass.
Fig 4
Fig 4
a. Port site placement for robotic partial nephrectomy. Periumbilical camera port for hilar tumor. Ports may be shifted laterally and superiorly for upper pole tumors. b. Schematic of port site placement demonstrating a periumbilical camera port (blue), robotic instrument ports (red), and assistant ports (yellow).
Fig 4
Fig 4
a. Port site placement for robotic partial nephrectomy. Periumbilical camera port for hilar tumor. Ports may be shifted laterally and superiorly for upper pole tumors. b. Schematic of port site placement demonstrating a periumbilical camera port (blue), robotic instrument ports (red), and assistant ports (yellow).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, Rogers C, Varkarakis I, Link RE, Inagaki T, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term oncological outcome. J Urol. 2004;172:871–873. - PubMed
    1. Lane BR, Gill IS. 5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2007;177:70–74. - PubMed
    1. Patel V. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urol. 2005;66:45–49. - PubMed
    1. Klingler DW, Hemstreet GP, Balaji KC. Feasibility of robotic radical nephrectomy--initial results of single-institution pilot study. Urol. 2005;65:1086–1089. - PubMed
    1. Horgan S, Benedetti E, Moser F. Robotically assisted donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Am J Surg. 2004;188:45S–51S. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms