Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos
- PMID: 17962212
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem287
Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos
Abstract
Background: The disposal of unused cryopreserved embryos can be a difficult decision for patients and the existence of unclaimed embryos raises ethical concerns for clinics. This study examined changes in patients' preferences for disposition of unused embryos and the relevance of a two-stage process for obtaining consent.
Methods: Patients who had not returned for cryopreserved embryos for over 5 years were contacted and asked to specify their current preferences for embryo disposition. These preferences were compared with dispositional choices made at the time of embryo freezing.
Results: Over one-third of patients had not returned for cryopreserved embryos within 5 years, and 31% of these declined to provide an updated directive. Those with a live birth through treatment were more likely to provide a new directive and more likely to choose to discard rather than donate embryos for research. Prior to IVF, the majority of non-returnees had elected to donate unused embryos for research, but 59% of all couples changed their minds after treatment.
Conclusions: Changes in preferences for embryo disposition was linked to treatment outcome and highlighted the need for a two-stage process to obtain fully informed consent. In this Canadian sample, patients' affinity for research declined after treatment.
Similar articles
-
How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients' views.Hum Reprod. 2007 Dec;22(12):3129-38. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem325. Hum Reprod. 2007. PMID: 18025028
-
Disposition of cryopreserved embryos by infertility patients desiring to discontinue storage.Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Mar 31. Fertil Steril. 2010. PMID: 19338995
-
Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: parents' choices.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009 Dec;12(4):185-90. doi: 10.3109/14647270903377186. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009. PMID: 19883291
-
The social implications of embryo cryopreservation.Fertil Steril. 2005 Oct;84(4):823-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.057. Fertil Steril. 2005. PMID: 16213829 Review.
-
Embryo disposition: the forgotten "child" of in vitro fertilization.Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;49(1):19-23. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2004. PMID: 15038505 Review.
Cited by
-
A patient-centred approach to embryo donation for research.Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Nov 7;5:44. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0098-z. eCollection 2016. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016. PMID: 27826412 Free PMC article.
-
The ethical dilemma of embryonic stem cell research.Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9326-7. Epub 2011 Oct 29. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013. PMID: 22038063
-
Psychological Counseling of Female Fertility Preservation Patients.J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(4):333-53. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2015.1045677. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25996581 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Disposition preferences in oocyte preservation patients.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jul;39(7):1619-1624. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02518-9. Epub 2022 May 19. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022. PMID: 35587300 Free PMC article.
-
One size does not fit all: the personal nature of completed embryo donation.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jul;41(7):1793-1806. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03156-z. Epub 2024 Jun 4. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 38833066 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources