[Shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanics and design]
- PMID: 17962920
- DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1156-6
[Shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanics and design]
Abstract
Shoulder arthroplasty is becoming increasingly important in orthopaedic surgery. Continuous development of the implants means that the modern endoprostheses make it possible to recreate the original anatomy with a high degree of accuracy. This is of decisive importance in the long-term restoration of physiological patterns of movement and achievement of pain relief. The modern shoulder arthroplasties allow adjustment of the important parameters: ante-/retroversion, inclination and offset to fit the individual anatomy of the proximal humerus. Fixation is the most important factor for the glenoid component; reduced bone stock can make this difficult. Cemented components are still the gold standard. For young patients surface replacement arthroplasty can be a good alternative treatment for early stages of osteoarthritis. In cuff tear arthropathy reverse prostheses can be used. Reversing the anatomical relationship between glenoid and humerus leads to medialisation and lowering of the center of rotation, which in turn leads to increased tension on the deltoid muscle. Because of the high complication rate this operation should be performed only by experienced shoulder surgeons.
Similar articles
-
[Current status and perspectives of shoulder replacement].Unfallchirurg. 1999 Sep;102(9):668-83. doi: 10.1007/s001130050465. Unfallchirurg. 1999. PMID: 10506358 Review. German.
-
[Shoulder prostheses].Unfallchirurg. 2006 Dec;109(12):1073-83; quiz 1084. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1204-4. Unfallchirurg. 2006. PMID: 17131100 German.
-
Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Dec;99(8):887-94. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013. PMID: 24211248
-
Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1 Suppl S):147S-161S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005. PMID: 15726075 Review.
-
Geometric variables in anatomic replacement of the proximal humerus: how much prosthetic geometry is necessary?J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun;18(3):366-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.011. Epub 2009 Mar 17. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009. PMID: 19297203
Cited by
-
[Implantation of a stem- and cement-free inverted shoulder prosthesis].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Apr;37(2):171-180. doi: 10.1007/s00064-025-00891-z. Epub 2025 Mar 12. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2025. PMID: 40072541 German.
-
[Biomechanical investigation on refixation of tuberosities on shoulder prostheses. Does refixation with different suture materials offer enough stability?].Unfallchirurg. 2010 Aug;113(8):641-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1817-5. Unfallchirurg. 2010. PMID: 20652212 German.
-
Outcomes of different stem sizes in shoulder arthroplasty.J Orthop. 2022 Oct 30;35:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.10.009. eCollection 2023 Jan. J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 36387763 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources