Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jan 25;126(4):297-309.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.008. Epub 2007 Sep 22.

Control of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections in pigs

Affiliations
Review

Control of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections in pigs

D Maes et al. Vet Microbiol. .

Abstract

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, the primary pathogen of enzootic pneumonia, occurs worldwide and causes major economic losses to the pig industry. The organism adheres to and damages the ciliated epithelium of the respiratory tract. Affected pigs show chronic coughing, are more susceptible to other respiratory infections and have a reduced performance. Control of the disease can be accomplished in a number of ways. First, management practices and housing conditions in the herd should be optimized. These include all-in/all-out production, limiting factors that may destabilize herd immunity, maintaining optimal stocking densities, prevention of other respiratory diseases, and optimal housing and climatic conditions. Strategic medication with antimicrobials active against M. hyopneumoniae and, preferably, also against major secondary bacteria may be useful during periods when the pigs are at risk for respiratory disease. Finally, commercial bacterins are widely used to control M. hyopneumoniae infections. The main effects of vaccination include less clinical symptoms, lung lesions and medication use, and improved performance. However, bacterins provide only partial protection and do not prevent colonization of the organism. Different vaccination strategies (timing of vaccination, vaccination of sows, vaccination combined with antimicrobial medication) can be used, depending on the type of herd, the production system and management practices, the infection pattern and the preferences of the pig producer. Research on new vaccines is actively occurring, including aerosol and feed-based vaccines as well as subunit and DNA vaccines. Eradication of the infection at herd level based on age-segregation and medication is possible, but there is a permanent risk for re-infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amass S., Baysinger A. Swine disease transmission and prevention. In: Straw B.E., Zimmerman J.J., D’Allaire S., Taylor D.J., editors. Diseases of Swine. 9th ed. Blacwell Publishing Ltd.; Oxford, UK: 2006. pp. 1075–1098.
    1. Baccaro M., Hirose F., Umehara O., Gonçalves L., Doto D., Paixão R., Shinya L., Moreno A. Comparative efficacy of two single-dose bacterins in the control of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in swine raised under commercial conditions in Brazil. Vet. J. 2006;172:526–531. - PubMed
    1. Bandrick M., Pieters M., Pijoan C., Molitor T. Proceedings of the Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, vol. 33, Supplement. College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota; Minneapolis MN, USA: 2006. Cellular immune response in piglets following sow vaccination wit Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae; p. 11.
    1. Bargen L. A system response to an outbreak of enzootic pneumonia in grow/finish pigs. Can. Vet. J. 2004;45:856–859. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Batista L., Pijoan C., Ruiz A., Utrera V., Dee S. Assessment of transmission of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae by personnel. J. Swine Health Prod. 2004;12:75–77.

MeSH terms