Cementless CUT femoral neck prosthesis: increased rate of aseptic loosening after 5 years
- PMID: 17966020
- DOI: 10.1080/17453670710014301
Cementless CUT femoral neck prosthesis: increased rate of aseptic loosening after 5 years
Abstract
Background: Bone-saving hip arthroplasty techniques, which facilitate revision, are gaining importance as the number of hip replacements in younger patients increases.
Patients and methods: 123 CUT femoral neck prostheses (ESKA Implants, Lübeck, Germany) were implanted in 113 patients (average age 53 years) between 1999 and 2002. After a mean follow-up of 5 (3-7) years, we determined the state of 120 prostheses; 3 patients could not be located. 97 patients with 107 prostheses, none of which had been revised, were evaluated clinically and radiographically.
Results: The median Harris hip score improved from 51 points to 92 points in the unrevised hips. 13 CUT prostheses (11%) had been revised, 7 because of aseptic loosening, 3 because of persisting thigh pain, 1 because of immediate vertical migration, and 2 because of septic loosening. The 5-year survival rate of the CUT prosthesis was 89%.
Interpretation: The medium-term survival with this type of femoral component is unsatisfactory, with a high rate of aseptic loosening. The surviving prostheses had a good clinical outcome.
Similar articles
-
[Medium-term results of the cementless femoral neck prosthesis CUT].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2006 Sep-Oct;144(5):477-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-942265. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2006. PMID: 16991063 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):59-64. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007. PMID: 17331456 Czech.
-
[Cementless femoral neck prosthesis CUT--clinical and radiological results after 5 years].Z Orthop Unfall. 2010 Aug;148(4):413-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1250150. Epub 2010 Aug 16. Z Orthop Unfall. 2010. PMID: 20714982 German.
-
[Choice of hip prosthesis in patients younger than 50 years].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Sep 1;151(35):1918-22. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007. PMID: 17907541 Review. Dutch.
-
[Surgical techniques used in the revision of hip prostheses].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Jun 20;142(25):1438-45. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998. PMID: 9752055 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies.Acta Orthop. 2014 Jun;85(3):250-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.908343. Epub 2014 Apr 3. Acta Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24694271 Free PMC article.
-
Are short-stem prostheses superior to conventional stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 21;8(9):e021649. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021649. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30244208 Free PMC article.
-
Five-year results of a cementless short-hip-stem prosthesis.Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Mar 19;5(1):e4. doi: 10.4081/or.2013.e4. Print 2013 Feb 22. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013. PMID: 23705062 Free PMC article.
-
Ten year results of the collum femoris preserving total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study of seventy five patients.Int Orthop. 2014 May;38(5):917-22. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2212-y. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Int Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24323351 Free PMC article.
-
[Periprosthetic femoral bone reaction after total hip arthroplasty with preservation of the collum femoris : CT-assisted osteodensitometry 1 and 3 years postoperatively].Orthopade. 2011 Jul;40(7):591-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1745-2. Orthopade. 2011. PMID: 21442330 German.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical