Beneficial effect of enteral feeding
- PMID: 17967372
- PMCID: PMC2121657
- DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2007.07.003
Beneficial effect of enteral feeding
Abstract
The last 4 decades have seen an explosion in nutritional research investigating both clinical and laboratory issues occurring in diverse groups of patients who cannot maintain a normal oral diet. Over the past 25 years, researchers have investigated how the administration of macro- and micronutrients via the gastrointestinal tract provides additional benefit over parenteral administration of similar nutrients. The administration of enteral feeding provides effects that are far beyond those of merely administering macro- and micronutrients. Rather, the processing of nutrients via the gastrointestinal tract stimulates a complex response that has implications for body composition and for immunologic integrity. Route and type of nutrition are important aspects of successful patient recovery.
Similar articles
-
The surgical/trauma patient.World Rev Nutr Diet. 2013;105:106-115. doi: 10.1159/000341279. Epub 2012 Oct 12. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2013. PMID: 23075592 Review.
-
Clinical benefits of early post-injury enteral feeding.Clin Intensive Care. 1995;6(1):21-7. Clin Intensive Care. 1995. PMID: 10150361 Review.
-
Nutrition of the critically ill patient and effects of implementing a nutritional support algorithm in ICU.J Clin Nurs. 2006 Feb;15(2):168-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01262.x. J Clin Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16422734 Clinical Trial.
-
Nutrition Provision in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Evidence, Challenges, and Clinical Considerations.Nutrients. 2025 Apr 30;17(9):1553. doi: 10.3390/nu17091553. Nutrients. 2025. PMID: 40362861 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current concepts on preoperative nutritional support: How, when and why?Cir Cir. 2022;90(4):556-563. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.20000893. Cir Cir. 2022. PMID: 35944458 English.
Cited by
-
Early versus delayed enteral nutrition in critically ill children under 12 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Clin Nutr Open Sci. 2025 Jun;61:108-128. doi: 10.1016/j.nutos.2025.03.004. Clin Nutr Open Sci. 2025. PMID: 40352760 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment Options in Gastrointestinal Cutaneous Fistulas.Surg J (N Y). 2017 Mar 14;3(1):e25-e31. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599273. eCollection 2017 Jan. Surg J (N Y). 2017. PMID: 28825016 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gastric-tube versus post-pyloric feeding in critical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pulmonary aspiration- and nutrition-related outcomes.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Sep;75(9):1337-1348. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-00860-2. Epub 2021 Feb 3. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021. PMID: 33536570
-
Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in the conservative treatment of upper gastrointestinal fistula after surgery: a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, phase III study (NUTRILEAK study).Trials. 2020 Jun 2;21(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04366-3. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32487210 Free PMC article.
-
Teleost fish models in membrane transport research: the PEPT1(SLC15A1) H+-oligopeptide transporter as a case study.J Physiol. 2014 Mar 1;592(5):881-97. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.259622. Epub 2013 Aug 27. J Physiol. 2014. PMID: 23981715 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Moore FA, Moore EE, Jones TN, et al. TEN vs. TPN following major abdominal trauma--Reduces septic morbidity. J Trauma. 1989;29:916–23. - PubMed
-
- Gramlich L, Kichian K, Pinilla J, et al. Does enteral nutrition compared to parenteral nutrition result in better outcomes in critically ill patients? A systematic review of the literature. Nutrition. 2004;20(10):843–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous