Control of an outbreak of infection with the hypervirulent Clostridium difficile BI strain in a university hospital using a comprehensive "bundle" approach
- PMID: 17968819
- DOI: 10.1086/522654
Control of an outbreak of infection with the hypervirulent Clostridium difficile BI strain in a university hospital using a comprehensive "bundle" approach
Abstract
Background: In June 2000, the hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile (CD) infection rate in our hospital (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, PA) increased to 10.4 infections per 1000 hospital discharges (HDs); the annual rate increased from 2.7 infections per 1000 HDs to 7.2 infections per 1000 HDs and was accompanied by an increase in the frequency of severe outcomes. Forty-seven (51%) of 92 HA CD isolates in 2001 were identified as the "epidemic BI strain." A comprehensive CD infection control "bundle" was implemented to control the outbreak of CD infection.
Methods: The CD infection control bundle consisted of education, increased and early case finding, expanded infection-control measures, development of a CD infection management team, and antimicrobial management. Process measures, antimicrobial usage, and hospital-acquired CD infection rates were analyzed, and CD isolates were typed.
Results: The rates of compliance with hand hygiene and isolation were 75% and 68%, respectively. The CD management team evaluated a mean of 31 patients per month (11% were evaluated for moderate or severe disease). Use of antimicrobial therapy associated with increased CD infection risk decreased by 41% during the period 2003-2005 (P<.001). The aggregate rate of CD infection during the period 2001-2006 decreased to 4.8 infections per 1000 HDs (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.1; P<.001) and by 2006, was 3.0 infections per 1000 HDs, a rate reduction of 71% (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-5.4; P<.001). During the period 2000-2001, the proportion of severe CD cases peaked at 9.4% (37 of 393 CD infections were severe); the rate decreased to 3.1% in 2002 and further decreased to 1.0% in 2006--a 78% overall reduction (odds ratio, 20.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-148.2; P<.001). In 2005, 13% of CD isolates were type BI (20% were hospital acquired), which represented a significant reduction from 2001 (P<.001).
Conclusions: The outbreak of CD infection with the BI strain in our hospital was controlled after implementing a CD infection control "bundle." Early identification, coupled with appropriate control measures, reduces the rate of CD infection and the frequency of adverse events.
Comment in
-
Confronting Clostridium difficile in inpatient health care facilities.Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 15;45(10):1274-6. doi: 10.1086/522655. Epub 2007 Oct 9. Clin Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17968820 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The A, B, BI, and Cs of Clostridium difficile.Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Oct 15;49(8):1148-52. doi: 10.1086/605639. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. PMID: 19780660 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Multipronged intervention strategy to control an outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and its impact on the rates of CDI from 2002 to 2007.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;30(2):156-62. doi: 10.1086/593955. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19125681
-
Decreasing Clostridium difficile infections in surgery: impact of a practice bundle incorporating a resident rounding protocol.Conn Med. 2013 Feb;77(2):69-75. Conn Med. 2013. PMID: 23513633
-
Clostridium difficile: familiar pathogen, changing epidemiology: a virulent strain has been appearing more often, even in patients not taking antibiotics.Am J Nurs. 2006 May;106(5):33-6. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200605000-00018. Am J Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16639241 Review. No abstract available.
-
Environmental interventions to control Clostridium difficile.Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;29(1):83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2014.11.006. Epub 2015 Jan 5. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 25573675 Review.
Cited by
-
Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):889-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01801-09. Epub 2010 Jan 13. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 20071552 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Feb;11(1):75-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-1-75. Clin Med (Lond). 2011. PMID: 21404793 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Clostridium difficile associated infection, diarrhea and colitis.World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr 7;15(13):1554-80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1554. World J Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19340897 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH) Testing Assay in the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infections: A High Sensitive Screening Test and an Essential Step in the Proposed Laboratory Diagnosis Workflow for Developing Countries like China.PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144604. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26659011 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiology of Klebsiella oxytoca-associated diarrhea detected by Simmons citrate agar supplemented with inositol, tryptophan, and bile salts.J Clin Microbiol. 2012 May;50(5):1571-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00163-12. Epub 2012 Feb 22. J Clin Microbiol. 2012. PMID: 22357507 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical