A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves
- PMID: 17968858
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.3121
A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves
Abstract
Non-inferiority is a reasonable approach to assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a new diagnostic test if it provides an easier administration or reduces the cost. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is one of the common measures for the overall diagnostic accuracy. However, it may not differentiate the various shapes of the ROC curves with different diagnostic significances. The partial area under the ROC curve (PAUROC) may present an alternative that can provide additional and complimentary information for some diagnostic tests which require false-positive rate that does not exceed a certain level. Non-parametric and maximum likelihood methods can be used for the non-inferiority tests based on the difference in paired PAUROCs. However, their performance has not been investigated in finite samples. We propose to use the concept of generalized p-value to construct a non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the difference in paired PAUROCs. Simulation results show that the proposed non-inferiority test not only adequately controls the size at the nominal level but also is uniformly more powerful than the non-parametric methods. The proposed method is illustrated with a numerical example using published data.
Similar articles
-
Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.Stat Med. 2006 Apr 15;25(7):1219-38. doi: 10.1002/sim.2358. Stat Med. 2006. PMID: 16158400
-
On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.Stat Med. 2008 Jan 30;27(2):224-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.2760. Stat Med. 2008. PMID: 17139702
-
Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves.Stat Med. 2009 Jan 30;28(2):349-59. doi: 10.1002/sim.3465. Stat Med. 2009. PMID: 18985706
-
Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.J Vet Cardiol. 2009 May;11 Suppl 1:S33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 May 17. J Vet Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19451045 Review.
-
Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.Muscle Nerve. 1994 Jul;17(7):815-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.880170719. Muscle Nerve. 1994. PMID: 8008012 Review.
Cited by
-
Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.Stat Med. 2011 Dec 30;30(30):3532-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.4401. Epub 2011 Dec 5. Stat Med. 2011. PMID: 22139763 Free PMC article.
-
The generalized inference on the ratio of mean differences for fraction retention noninferiority hypothesis.PLoS One. 2020 Jun 9;15(6):e0234432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234432. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32516350 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 May 23;14:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-70. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014. PMID: 24884381 Free PMC article.
-
Confidence interval estimation of the difference between two sensitivities to the early disease stage.Biom J. 2014 Mar;56(2):270-86. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201200012. Epub 2013 Nov 22. Biom J. 2014. PMID: 24265123 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(3):608-33. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.888437. J Biopharm Stat. 2014. PMID: 24707966 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical