Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007;3(4):467-79.
doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s1023.

Prolonged-release nicotinic acid for the management of dyslipidemia: an update including results from the NAUTILUS study

Affiliations
Review

Prolonged-release nicotinic acid for the management of dyslipidemia: an update including results from the NAUTILUS study

Anja Vogt et al. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007.

Abstract

Low HDL-cholesterol (<1.02 mmol/L [40 mg/dL] in men or <1.29 mmol/L [50 mg/dL] in women) occurs in about one-third of European patients with dyslipidemia and is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Simultaneous correction of low HDL-cholesterol and high total-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol may provide reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality beyond those possible with statins alone. Nicotinic acid (niacin in the US) is the most effective means of increasing HDL-cholesterol available and has been shown to reduce cardiovascular event rates significantly. Niaspan (prolonged-release nicotinic acid) provides a convenient, once-daily means of administering nicotinic acid. Clinical studies with Niaspan have demonstrated marked, long-term increases in HDL-cholesterol with additional useful benefits on triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, and lipid sub-profiles. The NAUTILUS study demonstrated the beneficial efficacy and tolerability profiles of Niaspan in a usual-care setting. The most common side-effect of Niaspan is flushing, which infrequently causes treatment discontinuation and which usually subsides over continued treatment. The ARBITER 2 and ARBITER 3 studies showed 1-2 years of treatment with Niaspan plus a statin induced regression of atherosclerosis in patients with coronary artery disease. The effect of Niaspan-statin treatment, relative to a statin alone, on clinical cardiovascular outcomes is currently under evaluation. Niaspan represents a practical means of correcting low HDL-cholesterol, an independent risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted coronary heart disease mortality rates according to HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels during 21 years of follow-up in 8586 Israeli men without coronary heart disease at baseline. Cut-off values to define low/high lipid levels were 0.9 mmol/L for HDL-cholesterol and 5.2 mmol/L for total-cholesterol. RR: risk ratios compared with corresponding low HDL-cholesterol group (adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure, smoking, and diabetes). Drawn from data presented by Goldbourt et al (1997).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose-related effect of Niaspan® (500–3000 mg/day) on lipid parameters in a 25-week, double-blind, randomized trial in 131 patients with hyperlipidemia. *p < 0.05 vs placebo. Effects of placebo have been omitted for clarity. Drawn from data presented by Goldberg et al (2000).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of effects on lipids of combinations of nicotinic acid with a statin in comparison with a combination of a statin with ezetimibe or rosuvastatin monotherapy in a 12-week, open-label, randomized trial in 292 patients indicated for LDL-cholesterol lowering therapy. Patients received rosuvastatin (20–40 mg), rosuvastatin plus Niaspan® (10/1000 mg or 20/1000 mg), atorvastatin plus Niaspan® (20/1000 mg or 40/2000 mg), or simvastatin plus ezetimibe (20/10 mg or 40/10 mg). Significance values are from ANOVA across groups. Drawn from data presented by McKenney et al (2006).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Long-term (96 weeks) effects of Niaspan® (up to 3000 mg/day) on the lipid profile in patients with dyslipidemia, with (n = 122) or without (n = 225) concomitant statin administration. Drawn from data presented by Guyton and Capuzzi (1998).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Flushing with Niaspan® in the NAUTILUS trial, a 15-week evaluation of Niaspan® at doses up to 2000 mg/day in 566 patients with dyslipidemia and low HDL-cholesterol managed in the usual care setting. Reproduced with permission from Vogt A, Kassner U, Hostalek U, et al 2006. Evaluation of the safety and tolerability of prolonged-release nicotinic acid in a usual care setting: the NAUTILUS study. Curr Med Res Opin, 22:417-25.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean changes in HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides in subgroups of the NAUTILUS population based on gender, presence/absence of the metabolic syndrome (MS), hypercholesterolemia (HC), isolated low HDL-cholesterol (ILH), receipt/non-receipt of statins, presence/absence of diabetes mellitus (DM), and age. Drawn from data presented by Vogt et al 2006a, , , .
Figure 7
Figure 7
Treatment assignments in the double-blind, randomized, ARBITER 2 study and its open-label follow-up study, ARBITER 3. Numbers of patients shown are those completing each phase. The duration each phase trial was 1 year; the Niaspan® daily dose was 1000 mg. Adapted with permission from Taylor AJ, Lee HJ, Sullenberger LE. 2006. The effect of 24 months of combination statin and extended-release niacin on carotid intima-media thickness: ARBITER 3. Curr Med Res Opin, 22:2243-50.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AIM-HIGH trial, www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00120289
    1. Al-Sheikh AA, Karas RH. Relative safety of lipid altering drugs in the general population. Abstract 3707, presented at the 2005. American Heart Association Scientific Sessions; Nov 13–6, 2005; Dallas, Texas, USA. 2005.
    1. Assmann G, Schulte H, von Eckardstein A, et al. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a predictor of coronary heart disease risk. The PROCAM experience and pathophysiological implications for reverse cholesterol transport. Atherosclerosis. 1996;124(Supp l):S11–20. - PubMed
    1. Balkau B, Charles MA, Drivsholm T, et al. Frequency of the WHO metabolic syndrome in European cohorts, and an alternative definition of an insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes Metab. 2002;28:364–76. - PubMed
    1. Bays HE, Dujovne CA, McGovern ME, et al. Comparison of once-daily, niacin extended-release/lovastatin with standard doses of atorvastatin and simvastatin (the ADvicor Versus Other Cholesterol-Modulating Agents Trial Evaluation [ADVOCATE]) Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:667–72. - PubMed