Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Fall;40(3):475-88.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-475.

Shaping academic task engagement with percentile schedules

Affiliations

Shaping academic task engagement with percentile schedules

Elizabeth S Athens et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Fall.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the use of percentile schedules as a method of quantifying the shaping procedure in an educational setting. We compared duration of task engagement during baseline measurements for 4 students to duration of task engagement during a percentile schedule. As a secondary purpose, we examined the influence on shaping of manipulations of the number of observations used to determine the criterion for reinforcement (the m parameter of the percentile formula). Results showed that the percentile formula was most effective when a relatively large m value (20 observations) was used.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results for Tony, Ashley, and Charles. Filled circles indicate the total duration of on-task behavior, plotted in seconds along the left y axis. Horizontal marks connected by a dotted line represent the average criterion for reinforcement of a response, plotted in seconds along the right y axis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results for Anthony. Filled circles indicate the total duration of on-task behavior, plotted in seconds along the left y axis. The horizontal marks connected by a dotted line represent the average criterion for reinforcement of a response, plotted in seconds along the right y axis.

References

    1. Bostow D.E, Bailey J.B. Modification of severe disruptive and aggressive behavior using brief timeout and reinforcement procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1969;2:31–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper J.O, Heron T.E, Heward W.L. Applied behavior analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1987.
    1. DeLeon I.G, Iwata B.A. Evaluation of a multiple stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1996;29:519–533. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galbicka G. Shaping in the 21st century: Moving percentile schedules into applied settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1994;27:739–760. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galbicka G, Fowler K.P, Ritch Z.J. Control over response number by a targeted percentile schedule: Reinforcement loss and the acute effects of d-amphetamine. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1991;56:205–215. - PMC - PubMed