Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Oct;12(4):375-82.
doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2007.00187.x.

Electrical storm in patients with an implanted defibrillator: a matter of definition

Affiliations
Review

Electrical storm in patients with an implanted defibrillator: a matter of definition

Carsten W Israel et al. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

The term "electrical storm" (ES) indicates a state of cardiac electrical instability manifested by several episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs) within a short time. In patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), ES is best defined as 3 appropriate VT detections in 24 h, treated by antitachycardia pacing, shock or eventually untreated but sustained in a VT monitoring zone. The number of shocks and inappropriate detections are irrelevant for the definition. ES occurs in approximately 25% of ICD patients within 3 years, with typically 5-55 individual VTs within one storm. Potential triggers can be found in approximately 66% of patients and include new/worsened heart failure, changes in antiarrhythmic medication, context with other illness, psychological stress, diarrhea, and hypokalemia. In most patients, ES consists of monomorphic VT indicating the presence of reentry while ventricular fibrillation indicating acute ischemia is rare. ES seems to have a low immediate mortality (1%) but frequently (50-80%) leads to hospitalization. Long-term prognostic implications of ES are unclear. The key intervention in ES is reduction of the elevated sympathetic tone by beta blockers and frequently benzodiazepines. Amiodarone i.v. has also been successful and azimilide seems promising while class I antiarrhythmic drugs are usually unsuccessful. Substrate mapping and VT ablation may be useful in treatment and prevention of ES. Prevention of ES requires ICD programming systematically avoiding unnecessary shocks (long VT detection, antitachycardia pacing where ever possible) which otherwise can fuel the sympathetic tone and prolong ES.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kowey PR. An overview of antiarrhythmic drug management of electrical storm. Can J Cardiol 1996;(12 Suppl B):3B–8B. - PubMed
    1. Bedell SE, Delbanco TL, Cook EF, et al Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. N Engl J Med 1983;309:569–576. - PubMed
    1. Urberg M, Ways C. Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for an in‐hospital cardiac arrest. J Fam Pract 1987;25:41–44. - PubMed
    1. Pires LA, Lehmann MH, Steinman RT, et al Sudden death in implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator recipients: clinical context, arrhythmic events and device responses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:24–32. - PubMed
    1. Villacastin J, Almendral J, Arenal A, et al Incidence and clinical significance of multiple consecutive, appropriate, high‐energy discharges in patients with implanted cardioverter‐defibrillators. Circulation 1996;93:753–762. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances