Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Nov;6(11):904-16.
doi: 10.1038/nrd2423.

Identifying genetic risk factors for serious adverse drug reactions: current progress and challenges

Affiliations
Review

Identifying genetic risk factors for serious adverse drug reactions: current progress and challenges

Russell A Wilke et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008 Feb;7(2):185

Abstract

Serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Some SADRs may be predictable, based upon a drug's pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Many, however, appear to be idiosyncratic. Genetic factors may underlie susceptibility to SADRs and the identification of predisposing genotypes may improve patient management through the prospective selection of appropriate candidates. Here we discuss three specific SADRs with an emphasis on genetic risk factors. These SADRs, selected based on wide-sweeping clinical interest, are drug-induced liver injury, statin-induced myotoxicity and drug-induced long QT and torsades de pointes. Key challenges for the discovery of predictive risk alleles for these SADRs are also considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Toxicities leading to drug withdrawal from the US market
Drug-induced toxicities associated with 28 drugs that were withdrawn from the US market between 1976 and 2005 (REFS –13). Percentage of total and number of cases shown in brackets. Cardiotoxicity refers to heart-related toxicities other than torsades de pointes. ‘Other’ refers to haemolytic anaemia (1), skin disease (1), immune toxicity (2), gastrointestinal toxicity (1), respiratory toxicity (1), fatal (1), neurotoxicity (1), blood-related toxicity (1) and birth defects (1).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Screening for patients with statin-induced mytotoxicity
In this example of automated case screening a search of an adverse drug reaction (ADR) database resulted in 5,000,000 patients with creatine kinase (CK) measurements and 200,000 of those patients were exposed to statins. These cases included 20,000 patients with elevated CK levels (over 500 units per L), which were linked to their patient charts and were subsequently screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria by trained research coordinators and lastly, by an expert physician. Age and gender matched controls are selected in a similar fashion. This figure was courtesy of R. K. Mareedu (Marshfield Clinic, Wisconsin, USA).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Marked QT interval prolongation and torsades de pointes
An example of QT interval during administration of the anti-arrhythmic drug dofetilide. a | QT interval before drug administration, the patient was in atrial fibrillation with a well-controlled ventricular response rate. A QT interval of 420 msec is indicated by the red bar. b | Following a single dose of dofetilide, the rhythm reverted to sinus (the desired therapeutic effect), but the QT interval prolonged markedly, to 560 msec. c | Shortly after the patient developed an episode of typical torsades de pointes. The sinus beat just before the arrhythmia displayed a very long QT interval (greater than 640 msec) and the beat was preceded by a pause. These ECG features are typical of torsades de pointes due to anti-arrhythmic drugs as well as non-cardiovascular medications.

References

    1. Pirmohamed M, Park BK. Genetic susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2001;22:298–305. [Review of adverse drug reaction (ADR) classifications and more common ADRs (in receptors, enzymes, transporters and immune response genes) with associations to genetic susceptibility.] - PubMed
    1. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200–1205. [Frequently cited meta-analysis of 39 prospective studies from US hospitals that determines the incidence of adverse drug reactions in US hospitals.] - PubMed
    1. Severino G, Del Zompo M. Adverse drug reactions: role of pharmacogenomics. Pharmacol. Res. 2004;49:363–373. - PubMed
    1. Pasanen MK, Neuvonen M, Neuvonen PJ, Niemi M. SLCO1B1 polymorphism markedly affects the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin acid. Pharmacogenet. Gen. 2006;16:873–879. - PubMed
    1. Giacomini KM, et al. When good drugs go bad. Nature. 2007;446:975–977. [An article highlighting the need for a global research consortium to study mechanisms and risk factors that contribute to severe adverse drug reactions.] - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances