Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;21(2):129-44.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9069-9. Epub 2007 Oct 31.

Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors

Affiliations

Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors

Denise Guliato et al. J Digit Imaging. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Malignant breast tumors and benign masses appear in mammograms with different shape characteristics: the former usually have rough, spiculated, or microlobulated contours, whereas the latter commonly have smooth, round, oval, or macrolobulated contours. Features that characterize shape roughness and complexity can assist in distinguishing between malignant tumors and benign masses. Signatures of contours may be used to analyze their shapes. We propose to use a signature based on the turning angle function of contours of breast masses to derive features that capture the characteristics of shape roughness as described above. We propose methods to derive an index of the presence of convex regions (XR ( TA )), an index of the presence of concave regions (VR ( TA )), an index of convexity (CX ( TA )), and two measures of fractal dimension (FD ( TA ) and FDd ( TA )) from the turning angle function. The methods were tested with a set of 111 contours of 65 benign masses and 46 malignant tumors with different parameters. The best classification accuracies in discriminating between benign masses and malignant tumors, obtained for XR ( TA ), VR ( TA ), CX ( TA ), FD ( TA ), and FDd ( TA ) in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, were 0.92, 0.92, 0.93, 0.93, and, 0.92, respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
a A manually drawn contour of a benign mass with a relatively smooth and convex contour with 916 points (pixels) and resolution of 50 μm per pixel. b Turning angle function of the contour with TC(Sl) = 0° and TC(S916) = 360°.
Fig 2
Fig 2
a A manually drawn contour of a malignant tumor with a spiculated contour including concave and convex segments with 2,478 points (pixels) and resolution of 50 μm per pixel. b Turning angle function of the contour with TC(Sl) = 315° and TC(S2478) = 675°.
Fig 3
Fig 3
A manually drawn contour of a malignant tumor: a Adjacent segments within the dashed ellipse possess high internal angles and are small (caused by hand tremor or other limitations). Some adjacent segments within the solid ellipse present relevant internal angles. b The respective artifacts of the highlighted regions on the contour represented in the turning angle function. The region inside the dashed ellipse is represented in the turning angle function as the region between the dashed lines with a sequence of small segments with different directions. The region inside the solid ellipse is represented in the turning angle function as a sequence of segments of different sizes with large changes in direction.
Fig 4
Fig 4
a Filtered version of the contour in Figure 3a with reduction of artifacts. b Filtered version of the turning angle function in Figure 3b with Smin = 10 pixels and θmax = 170°.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a Filtered version of the contour in Figure 1a with reduction of artifacts. b Filtered version of the turning angle function in Figure 1b with Smin = 10 pixels and θmax = 170°.
Fig 6
Fig 6
a Filtered version of the contour in Figure 2a with reduction of artifacts. b Filtered version of the turning angle function in Figure 2b with Smin = 10 pixels and θmax = 170°.
Fig 7
Fig 7
Signatures based on the turning angle function with Smin = 10 pixels and θmax = 170° of: a The benign mass with a nearly convex contour shown in Figure 1; b The malignant tumor with a spiculated contour shown in Figure 2. See also Figures 5 and 6.
Fig 8
Fig 8
a A manually drawn contour of a circumscribed benign mass. FDTA = 0.0, FDTA = 0.0, VRTA = 0.0, XRTA = 1.0, and CXTA = 1.0. b The signature based on the turning angle function with Smin = 10 pixels and θmax = 170°.
Fig 9
Fig 9
a A manually drawn contour of a macrolobulated malignant tumor. FDTA = 0.14, FDdTA = 0.11, VRTA = 0.45, XRTA = 0.98, and CXTA = 0.76. b The signature based on the turning angle function with Smin = 10 pixels and θmax = 170°.
Fig 10
Fig 10
a A manually drawn contour of a microlobulated malignant tumor. FDTA = 0.32, FDdTA = 0.30, VRTA = 0.24, XRTA = 0.78, and CXTA = 0.77. b The signature based on the turning angle function with Smin = 10 pixels and θmax = 170°.
Fig 11
Fig 11
a A manually drawn contour of a spiculated malignant tumor. FDTA = 0.61, FDdTA = 0.57, VRTA = 0.42, XRTA = 0.64, and CXTA = 0.61. b The signature based on the turning angle function with Smin = 10 pixels and θmax = 170°.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Homer MJ. Mammographic Interpretation: A Practical Approach. 2. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
    1. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BI-RADS. 4. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2004.
    1. Rangayyan RM, El-Faramawy NM, Desautels JEL, Alim OA. Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997;16(6):799–810. doi: 10.1109/42.650876. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rangayyan RM, Mudigonda NR, Desautels JEL. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000;38:487–496. doi: 10.1007/BF02345742. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alto H, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JEL: Content-based retrieval and analysis of mammographic masses. J Electron Imaging 14(2):023016:1–17, 2005

Publication types