Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;8(11):977-81.
doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401110.

Falling off the academic bandwagon. Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition

Affiliations

Falling off the academic bandwagon. Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition

Elisabeth D Martinez et al. EMBO Rep. 2007 Nov.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fewer women will pursue a principal investigator position. (A) The responses of female and male fellows on the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Intramural Research Program indicating whether they are considering pursuing the principal investigator (PI) career track; P < 0.0001 for gender differences in all cases. (B) The responses of fellows indicating whether they would continue to pursue a PI position if their first application failed; P < 0.0001 across all responses for gender difference, as well as for US (researchers from the USA) and non-US (researchers from outside the USA) responses within each gender.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Family considerations are important to more women than men. (A) The percentage of respondents who rated the indicated factors as very or extremely important in their pursuit (or otherwise) of the principal investigator (PI) career track. (B) The responses of married fellows regarding career concessions they are willing to make for and expect from their partners. (C) The percentage of respondents who rated the indicated factors as very or extremely important to make the PI career track more attractive. All gender differences shown, except for competition in the field in panel (A), are statistically significant with P < 0.05.
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None

References

    1. Baltimore D, Summers LH, Hockfield S, Tilghman SM, Hennessy J, Brigeneau R, Coleman MS, Gutmann A, Levin RC (2005) Joint Statement by the Nine Presidents on Gender Equity in Higher Education. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    1. Bhattacharjee Y (2004) Family matters: stopping tenure clock may not be enough. Science 306: 2031–2033 - PubMed
    1. Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP) (2007) Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Arlington, VA, USA: National Science Foundation - PubMed
    1. EC (2003) Waste of Talents: Turning Private Struggles into a Public Issue—Women and Science in the Enwise Countries. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission
    1. EC (2006) She Figures 2006. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission

Publication types