High loads induce differences between actual and imagined movement duration
- PMID: 17973107
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1154-2
High loads induce differences between actual and imagined movement duration
Abstract
Actual and imagined action may be governed by common information and neural processes. This hypothesis has found strong support from a range of chronometric studies showing that it takes the same amount of time to actually move and to imagine moving. However, exceptions have been observed when actual and imagined movements were made under conditions of inertial loading: sometimes the equivalency of actual and imagined movement durations (MDs) has been preserved, and other times it has been disrupted. The purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that the appearance and magnitude of actual-imagined MD differences in those studies was dependent on the level of load relative to the maximum loading capacity of the involved effector system [the maximum voluntary load (MVL)]. The experiment required 12 young, healthy humans to actually produce, and to imagine producing, single degree of freedom index finger movements under a range of loads (0, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80% MVL). As predicted, statistically significant actual-imagined MD differences were absent at lower loads (0-20% MVL), but differences appeared and increased in magnitude with further increases in %MVL (40 and 80% MVL). That pattern of results may relate to the common, everyday experience individuals have in interacting with loads. Participants are likely to have extensive experience interacting with very low loads, but not high loads. It follows that the control of low inertial loads should be governed by complete central representations of action, while representations should be less complete for high loads. A consequence may be increases in the uncertainty of predicting motor output with increases in load. Compensation for the increased uncertainty may appear as increases in the MD values selected during both the preparation and imagery of action--according to a speed-uncertainty trade-off. Then, during actual action, MD may be reduced if movement-related feedback indicates that a faster movement would succeed.
Similar articles
-
Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task.Behav Brain Res. 2002 Aug 21;134(1-2):209-15. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00030-x. Behav Brain Res. 2002. PMID: 12191807 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of physical practice on the duration of motor imagery.Behav Brain Res. 2025 Feb 28;479:115354. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115354. Epub 2024 Nov 25. Behav Brain Res. 2025. PMID: 39603422
-
Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass.Exp Brain Res. 2002 Apr;143(4):447-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1012-1. Epub 2002 Feb 16. Exp Brain Res. 2002. PMID: 11914790
-
Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review.J Mot Behav. 2005 Jan;37(1):10-20. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.1.10-20. J Mot Behav. 2005. PMID: 15642689 Review.
-
Mental imagery in the motor context.Neuropsychologia. 1995 Nov;33(11):1419-32. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00073-c. Neuropsychologia. 1995. PMID: 8584178 Review.
Cited by
-
Misperceiving the speed-accuracy tradeoff: imagined movements and perceptual decisions.Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jan;192(1):121-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1563-x. Epub 2008 Sep 20. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 18807021
-
Executive functions in motor imagery: support for the motor-cognitive model over the functional equivalence model.Exp Brain Res. 2020 Apr;238(4):931-944. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05756-4. Epub 2020 Mar 16. Exp Brain Res. 2020. PMID: 32179942 Free PMC article.
-
Motor imagery effectiveness for mirror reversed movements.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar;11(1):22-31. doi: 10.3758/s13415-010-0008-8. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21264641
-
Examining the equivalence between imagery and execution within the spatial domain - Does motor imagery account for signal-dependent noise?Exp Brain Res. 2020 Dec;238(12):2983-2992. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05939-z. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Exp Brain Res. 2020. PMID: 33084933 Free PMC article.
-
Physiological changes in response to apnea impact the timing of motor representations: a preliminary study.Behav Brain Funct. 2014 Apr 28;10:15. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-10-15. Behav Brain Funct. 2014. PMID: 24773625 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous