Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in an internal medicine resident clinic--a randomized trial
- PMID: 17973175
- PMCID: PMC2219846
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0431-x
Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in an internal medicine resident clinic--a randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Disease registries, audit and feedback, and clinical reminders have been reported to improve care processes.
Objective: To assess the effects of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention on diabetes care.
Design: Randomized controlled trial conducted in a resident continuity clinic during the 2003-2004 academic year.
Participants: Seventy-eight categorical Internal Medicine residents caring for 483 diabetic patients participated. Residents randomized to the intervention (n = 39) received instruction on diabetes registry use; quarterly performance audit, feedback, and written reports identifying patients needing care; and had letters sent quarterly to patients needing hemoglobin A1c or cholesterol testing. Residents randomized to the control group (n = 39) received usual clinic education.
Measurements: Hemoglobin A1c and lipid monitoring, and the achievement of intermediate clinical outcomes (hemoglobin A1c <7.0%, LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL, and blood pressure <130/85 mmHg) were assessed.
Results: Patients cared for by residents in the intervention group had higher adherence to guideline recommendations for hemoglobin A1c testing (61.5% vs 48.1%, p = .01) and LDL testing (75.8% vs 64.1%, p = .02). Intermediate clinical outcomes were not different between groups.
Conclusions: Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in a resident continuity clinic modestly improved diabetes care processes, but did not influence intermediate clinical outcomes.
References
-
- None
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1056/NEJMsa022615', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa022615'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12826639', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12826639/'}]}
- McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11816692', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11816692/'}]}
- Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(6):64–78. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.288.15.1909', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.15.1909'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12377092', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12377092/'}]}
- Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. JAMA. 2002;288(15):1909–14. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0171.x', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0171.x'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC1490197', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1490197/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16117756', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16117756/'}]}
- Schmittdiel J, Bodenheimer T, Solomon NA, Gillies RR, Shortell SM. Brief report: the prevalence and use of chronic disease registries in physician organizations. A national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(9):855–8. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
