Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;8(11):822-30.
doi: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0822.

Evaluation of the effect and profitability of gene-assisted selection in pig breeding system

Affiliations

Evaluation of the effect and profitability of gene-assisted selection in pig breeding system

Ya-Lan Li et al. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect and profitability of using the quantitative trait loci (QTL)-linked direct marker (DR marker) in gene-assisted selection (GAS).

Methods: Three populations (100, 200, or 300 sows plus 10 boars within each group) with segregating QTL were simulated stochastically. Five economic traits were investigated, including number of born alive (NBA), average daily gain to 100 kg body weight (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), back fat at 100 kg body weight (BF) and intramuscular fat (IMF). Selection was based on the estimated breeding value (EBV) of each trait. The starting frequencies of the QTL's favorable allele were 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5, respectively. The economic return was calculated by gene flow method.

Results: The selection efficiency was higher than 100% when DR markers were used in GAS for 5 traits. The selection efficiency for NBA was the highest, and the lowest was for ADG whose QTL had the lowest variance. The mixed model applied DR markers and obtained higher extra genetic gain and extra economic returns. We also found that the lower the frequency of the favorable allele of the QTL, the higher the extra return obtained.

Conclusion: GAS is an effective selection scheme to increase the genetic gain and the economic returns in pig breeding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow of animals between tiers and pigs sent to slaughter for a 6-month period in 100-sow nucleus. Numbers are pigs per 6 months

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blattman AN, Kirkpatrick BW, Gregory KE. A search for quantitative trait loci for ovulation rate in cattle. Anim Genet. 1996;27:157–162. - PubMed
    1. Brascamp EW, van Arendonk JAM, Groen AF. Economic appraisal of the utilization of genetic markers in dairy cattle breeding. J Dairy Sci. 1993;76:1204–1213.
    1. Cao HZ. The Breeding Plan for High Quality Pigs. China Agricultural University; 2003. (in Chinese, Ph.D. Thesis)
    1. Chakraborty RL, Moreau RL, Dekkers JCM. A general method to optimize selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci. Genet Sel Evol. 2002;34(2):145–170. doi: 10.1051/gse:2002001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dekkers JCM. Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. J Anim Sci. 2004;82(Suppl.):313–328. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances