Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008;40(1):117-23.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-007-9293-8. Epub 2007 Nov 2.

Erectile dysfunction may predict coronary artery disease: relationship between coronary artery calcium scoring and erectile dysfunction severity

Affiliations

Erectile dysfunction may predict coronary artery disease: relationship between coronary artery calcium scoring and erectile dysfunction severity

Onder Yaman et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) in terms of coronary artery calcium (CAC) levels assessed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and to find out if ED severity may predict coronary heart disease risk.

Patients and method: Sixty men with a mean age of 55.7 (41-77) years with ED and 23 men with a mean age of 53.2 (39-76) years without ED, who admitted to our clinic between January 2005 and December 2005, were included in the study. All patients answered the standard International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) forms, and were classified into four groups as mild, moderate, severe ED and no ED. CAC levels were assessed by MDCT protocol. CAC levels and IIEF scores were analyzed within each group.

Results: Pearson correlation test demonstrated significant negative correlation between IIEF score and CAC score (r= -497; P<0.0001). CAC scores increased significantly with regard to IIEF scores decrease: IIEF 1-10 (n=18), mean CAC: 557.7; IIEF 11-16 (n=13), mean CAC: 541.3; IIEF 17-25 (n=29), mean CAC: 84.6; and IIEF >or= 26 [n=23 (Control group)], mean CAC: 10.1. The difference between the mean CAC scores of these four groups was statistically significant (P<0.0001). When we took the cut-off value for IIEF score 26 we observed significantly higher CAC scores at the group of IIEF <26 (mean 325.5 vs 10.1; P<0.0001).

Conclusion: We observed positive correlation with ED severity and CAC levels. Therefore, we think that detection and quantification of preclinical coronary artery disease by CAC scoring with a non-invasive method might have a great potential for early cardiac preventive measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Apr 21;43(8):1405-11 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2004 Jan 14;291(2):210-5 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2001 Jun;87(9):838-45 - PubMed
    1. J Sex Med. 2006 Jan;3(1):28-36; discussion 36 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 1999 Aug;54(2):346-51 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources