Comparison of insertion characteristics of two types of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated positive profile transfixation pins in the third metacarpal bone of horses
- PMID: 17975969
- DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.68.11.1160
Comparison of insertion characteristics of two types of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated positive profile transfixation pins in the third metacarpal bone of horses
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of 2 hydroxyapatite pin coatings on heat generated at the bone-pin interface and torque required for insertion of transfixation pins into cadaveric equine third metacarpal bone.
Sample population: Third metacarpal bone pairs from 27 cadavers of adult horses.
Procedures: Peak temperature of the bone at the cis-cortex and the hardware and pin at the trans-cortex was measured during insertion of a plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite (PSHA)-coated, biomimetic hydroxyapatite (BMHA)-coated, or uncoated large animal transfixation pin. End-insertional torque was measured for each pin. The bone-pin interface was examined grossly and histologically for damage to the bone and coating.
Results: The BMHA-coated transfixation pins had similar insertion characteristics to uncoated pins. The PSHA-coated pins had greater mean peak bone temperature at the cis-cortex and greater peak temperature at the trans-cortex (70.9 +/- 6.4(o)C) than the uncoated pins (38.7 +/- 8.4(o)C). The PSHA-coated pins required more insertional torque (10,380 +/- 5,387.8 Nmm) than the BMHA-coated pins (5,123.3 +/- 2,296.9 Nmm). Four of the PSHA-coated pins became immovable after full insertion, and 1 gross fracture occurred during insertion of this type of pin.
Conclusions and clinical relevance: The PSHA coating was not feasible for use without modification of presently available pin hardware. The BMHA-coated pins performed similarly to uncoated pins. Further testing is required in an in vivo model to determine the extent of osteointegration associated with the BMHA-coated pins in equine bone.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated pins for transfixation casting in horses.Am J Vet Res. 2012 May;73(5):724-34. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.5.724. Am J Vet Res. 2012. PMID: 22533407 Clinical Trial.
-
Hydroxyapatite-coated external fixation pins.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005 Jul;2(4):465-71. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2.4.465. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005. PMID: 16293085 Review.
-
In vitro comparison of two centrally threaded, positive-profile transfixation pin designs for use in third metacarpal bones in horses.Am J Vet Res. 2010 Aug;71(8):976-81. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.71.8.976. Am J Vet Res. 2010. PMID: 20673099
-
Comparison of insertion characteristics of tapered and cylindrical transfixation pins in third metacarpal bones of equine cadavers.Am J Vet Res. 2017 Oct;78(10):1200-1209. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.78.10.1200. Am J Vet Res. 2017. PMID: 28945124
-
State of the art review: techniques to avoid pin loosening and infection in external fixation.J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Mar;16(3):189-95. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200203000-00009. J Orthop Trauma. 2002. PMID: 11880783 Review.
Cited by
-
Innovative approach in the treatment of comminuted proximal phalanx fractures in horses based on biomechanical modelling.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 19;15(1):13562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95577-8. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40253474 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources