Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;30(1):78-91.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20487.

Cortical network dynamics during source memory retrieval: current density imaging with individual MRI

Affiliations

Cortical network dynamics during source memory retrieval: current density imaging with individual MRI

Young Youn Kim et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

We investigated the neural correlates of source memory retrieval using low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) with 64 channels EEG and individual MRI as a realistic head model. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while 13 healthy subjects performed the source memory task for the voice of the speaker in spoken words. The source correct condition of old words elicited more positive-going potentials than the correct rejection condition of new words at 400-700 ms post-stimulus and the old/new effects also appeared in the right anterior region between 1,000 and 1,200 ms. We conducted source reconstruction at mean latencies of 311, 604, 793, and 1,100 ms and used statistical parametric mapping for the statistical analysis. The results of source analysis suggest that the activation of the right inferior parietal region may reflect retrieval of source information. The source elicited by the difference ERPs between the source correct and source incorrect conditions exhibited dynamic change of current density activation in the overall cortices with time during source memory retrieval. These results indicate that multiple neural systems may underlie the ability to recollect context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Grand‐average ERPs elicited by source correct, source incorrect, and correct rejection conditions and topographies of old/new effects and the difference ERP between source correct and source incorrect conditions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Statistical parametric map of t statistic (SPM{t}) for ERP generator elicited by source correct, source incorrect, and correct rejection conditions at the latency of 604 ms and 1,100 ms. L/A, left anterior; R/P, right posterior. Statistical map of one‐sample t‐test displays significant activation of mean current density in memory conditions. These images were thresholded at t > 3.93 (P < 0.001 uncorrected, extent k = 50). Right bottom images in each comparison displayed the activation region on the rendered image by the two‐surface method of SUMA (http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni/suma).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Statistical parametric maps displaying changed current density of source correct ERPs between 604 and 311 ms and between 604 and 793 ms. L/A, left anterior; R/P, right posterior. Significantly activated areas (t = 3.05, P = 0.005 uncorrected, extent k = 30) are shown on the Talairach coordinate. Cortical activities in the right precentral gyrus and supramarginal gyrus (Talairach coordinates 18/−26/66, BA 4; 58/−36/32, BA 40) increased in 604 ms, when compared with those in 311 ms. The activity of right inferior parietal lobule (Talairach coordinates 54/−36/40, BA 40) increased in 604 ms than 793 ms. Right bottom images in each comparison displayed the activation region on the rendered image.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Statistical parametric map of t statistic (SPM{t}) for cortical generator elicited by difference ERP between source correct and source incorrect conditions at the latencies of 604, 793, and 1,100 ms. L/A, left anterior; R/P, right posterior. Statistical map of one‐sample t‐test displays significant activation of mean current density in memory conditions. These images were thresholded at t > 3.93 (P < 0.001 uncorrected, extent k = 50). Right bottom images in each time point displayed the activation region on the rendered image by the two‐surface method of SUMA (http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni/suma).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alhaj HA,Massey AE,McAllister‐Williams RH ( 2005): Effects of DHEA administration on episodic memory, cortisol and mood in healthy young men: A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Psychopharmacology 18: 1–11. - PubMed
    1. Allan K,Wilding EL,Rugg MD ( 1998): Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. Acta Psychologica 98: 231–252. - PubMed
    1. Buckner RL,Wheeler ME ( 2001): The cognitive neuroscience of remembering. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 624–634. - PubMed
    1. Burgess PW,Shallice T ( 1996): Confabulation and the control of recollection. Memory 4: 359–411. - PubMed
    1. Burgess N,Maguire EA,Spiers HJ,O'Keefe J ( 2001): A temporoparietal and prefrontal network for retrieving the spatial context of lifelike events. Neuroimage 14: 439–453. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms