Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;68(6):942-50.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.03120.x. Epub 2007 Nov 2.

Serum IGF-I measured by four different immunoassays in patients with adult GH deficiency or acromegaly and in a control population

Affiliations

Serum IGF-I measured by four different immunoassays in patients with adult GH deficiency or acromegaly and in a control population

Maria Luisa Granada et al. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Background: IGF-I is a useful tool in GH disorders diagnosis, however, the use of commercially available kits needs to be validated.

Objective: To validate the use of serum IGF-I concentrations measured by four immunoassays in the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency and acromegaly.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Patients: Fifty GH-deficient (GHD) patients, 41 acromegaly patients and 405 controls.

Measurements: Serum IGF-I concentrations were measured by four commercial immunoassays: (1) RIA-NICHOLS; (2) ICMA-IMMULITE; (3) IRMA-IMMUNOTECH; and (4) non-extraction-IRMA-DSL. Reference values were established from the control population in six age groups. Individual results were transformed to standard deviation score (SD score) from the age-related reference population and reference data provided by each assay manufacturer. Diagnostic sensitivity for GH deficiency was calculated.

Results: IGF-I measured by the four assays differed significantly. In controls, assay 2 yielded the lowest results, followed by assays 1, 3 and 4 (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). IGF-I declined with age, but no sex-related differences were observed. When IGF-I was standardized with respect to reference data obtained from the manufacturers, it showed better sensitivity in assays 1 and 2, than with our controls (65%vs. 77.5% and 58%vs. 70%, respectively) for GHD diagnosis. With assays 3 and 4, higher sensitivity was obtained when standardized with our controls (62%vs. 52% and 56%vs. 36%, respectively). In acromegaly, IGF-I was > 2 SD score with all assays.

Conclusions: IGF-I SD score for GHD diagnosis differed according to the normative data used. All assays proved to be useful for active acromegaly diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources