Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov 2;131(3):584-95.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.045.

SUMO-specific protease 1 is essential for stabilization of HIF1alpha during hypoxia

Affiliations

SUMO-specific protease 1 is essential for stabilization of HIF1alpha during hypoxia

Jinke Cheng et al. Cell. .

Abstract

SUMOylation is a dynamic process, catalyzed by SUMO-specific ligases and reversed by Sentrin/SUMO-specific proteases (SENPs). The physiologic consequences of SUMOylation and deSUMOylation are not fully understood. Here we investigate the phenotypes of mice lacking SENP1 and find that SENP1(-/-) embryos show severe fetal anemia stemming from deficient erythropoietin (Epo) production and die midgestation. We determine that SENP1 controls Epo production by regulating the stability of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF1alpha) during hypoxia. Hypoxia induces SUMOylation of HIF1alpha, which promotes its binding to a ubiquitin ligase, von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) protein, through a proline hydroxylation-independent mechanism, leading to its ubiquitination and degradation. In SENP1(-/-) MEFs, hypoxia-induced transcription of HIF1alpha-dependent genes such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1) is markedly reduced. These results show that SENP1 plays a key role in the regulation of the hypoxic response through regulation of HIF1alpha stability and that SUMOylation can serve as a direct signal for ubiquitin-dependent degradation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Severe anemia in the SENP1−/− embryos
(A) The ratios of the observed live and dead (in parentheses) SENP1−/− embryos to the total number of embryos analyzed at different stages of embryonic development. (B) Appearance of SENP1+/+ and SENP1−/− embryos at E15.5. The SENP1−/− embryo and yolk sac were paler and smaller than those of the wild-type embryo and appeared to contain fewer red blood cells in major blood vessels. (C) Relative numbers of red blood cells in peripheral blood in E15.5 wild-type (+/+, n = 5), heterozygote (+/−, n = 9), and SENP1 (−/−, n = 4) embryos. Results shown are means ± SD. A significant decrease in the number of red blood cells was found in SENP1 (−/−) embryos (p < 0.007), when compared with those in wild-type or heterozygote embryos. (D) Total number of nucleated cells per fetal liver in E13.5 (+/+: n = 4; −/−: n = 3), E14.5 (+/+: n = 4; −/−: n = 4), and E15.5 embryos (+/+: n = 5; −/−: n = 3). Results shown are means ± SD. Significant differences between wildtype and mutant embryos were found at E14.5 (p < 0.015) and E15.5 (p < 0.004). (E) Hematoxylin and Eosin-stained sections of fetal liver from E12.5 SENP1+/+ and −/− embryos. The SENP1−/− fetal liver showed a marked decrease in the number of erythropoietic foci and increase in apoptotic cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2. SENP1−/− erythroid progenitors undergo apoptosis due to Epo deficiency
(A) Analysis of CFU-e- and BFU-e-forming ability of fetal liver cells from E13.5 SENP1+/+ and SENP1−/− embryos. Results shown are means ± SD determined from three embryos. The number of CFU-e from liver cells of SENP1−/− embryos was significantly less than that from SENP1+/+ embryos (p<0.05). (B) Liver cells isolated from E13.5 SENP1+/+ and SENP1−/− embryos were stained with Ter-119 antibody and analyzed by the TUNEL procedure. Histograms show TUNEL staining profile of the Ter-119-positive population identified by flow cytometry. The percentages in the histograms are the percentages of TUNEL-positive cells. (C) RT–PCR analysis of a variety of genes that are involved in erythroid differentiation in fetal livers of SENP1+/+ and SENP1−/− embryos at E11.5. Samples were amplified for 36, 39, and 42 cycles for Epo; 25, 28, and 32 cycles for EpoR, c-kit, SCF, Jak2, and STAT5. β-Actin mRNA levels (amplified for 18, 21, and 24 cycles) were measured as control. (D) Fetal liver sections from E12.5 SENP1+/+ and SENP1−/− embryos were stained with anti-Epo antibody (brown). (E and F) Fetal liver cells isolated from E13.5 SENP1+/+ and SENP1−/− embryos were cultured for 24 hours in the absence or presence of Epo (5 U/ml). Cell numbers were counted under microscope (E). Results shown in (E) are means ± SD determined from three embryos. TUNEL-positive cells were quantitated by flow cytometry. Percentages in histograms are the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells (F).
Figure 3
Figure 3. SENP1 regulates Epo production through HIF1α
(A) ELISA analysis of Epo production in Hep 3B cells. Data are presented as means ± SD of the results of three independent experiments for Figure 3A, B, C, and D. (NS = Non-specific siRNA). (B) SENP1 enhanced Epo transcription induced by hypoxia. The indicated reporter gene, HIF1α, and SENP1 expression plasmids were co-transfected into Hep 3B cells. The cells were treated with hypoxia (1% O2) for 12 hr before luciferase assay. The Epo reporter gene with mutation of HIF1α binding sites on the Epo enhancer is indicated by mEpo-Luc. SENP1m is the catalytically inactive SENP1. (C) SENP1 enhanced HIF1α-dependent Epo transcription. The indicated reporter gene, HIF1α, and SENP1 expression plasmids were co-transfected into Hep 3B cells. (D) SENP1 was essential for HIF1α-dependent Epo transcription. Epo-Luc and the indicated siRNA expression plasmids were co-transfected into Hep 3B cells without or with HIF1α plasmids.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Defect in hypoxia-induced stabilization of HIF1α in SENP1−/− embryos
(A) HIF1α expression was decreased in SENP1−/− fetal liver. Fetal liver sections from E12.5 SENP1+/+ and SENP1−/− embryos were stained with anti-HIF1α antibody (brown). (B) Hypoxia-induced HIF1α protein expression was decreased in SENP1−/− MEF cells. SENP1+/+ and −/− MEF cells were treated with hypoxia (1% O2) for 3 hrs before harvest. The whole cell lysate was analyzed by western blotting with anti-HIF1α and Actin antibodies. (C) The half-life of HIF1α protein under hypoxia was decrease in SENP1−/− MEF cells. (D) SENP1 was essential for hypoxia-induced HIF1α ODD (344–698) activity. 293 cells were transfected with pGal4-VP16 or pGal4-ODD (344–698)-VP16 plus other plasmids as indicated. Cells were incubated for 12 hrs in normoxia or hypoxia (1% O2) before harvest. The data are presented as the corrected (by internal control) pGal4-ODD-VP16 luciferase activity that normalized to the counts of pGal4-VP16. (E) Hypoxia-induced HIF1α activity was significantly reduced in SENP1−/− MEF cells. Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments (F) Hypoxia-induced expression of VEGF and Glut-1 was reduced in SENP1−/− MEF cells. Expression of VEGF, Glut-1, and Actin-β was determined in SENP1+/+ or −/− MEF cells by RT-PCR. (G) HIF1α restored hypoxia-induced expression of VEGF in SENP1−/− MEF cells. SENP1−/− MEF cells were transfected with HIF1α SM (SUMOylation mutant), or vector control plasmids and treated with hypoxia (1% O2) for different time as indicated. Expression of VEGF and Actin-β was determined by RT-PCR.
Figure 5
Figure 5. SUMOylated HIF1α accumulated in SENP1−/− MEF cells and underwent proteasomal-dependent degradation in the hypoxic condition
(A) SENP1 de-conjugated SUMOylated HIF1α in vitro. SUMOylated GST-ODD (344–698) PM recombinant protein was produced by in vitro SUMOylation. Flag-SENP1 or SENP1m was generated by in vitro translation. SUMOylated GST-ODDPM and SENP1 (or SENP1m) were incubated for 1 hr at 37 °C. The reaction mixtures were detected by western blot with anti-HIF1α (left panel), anti-SUMO-1 (right panel), and anti-Flag antibodies (bottom panel). (B) Mutation of SUMOylation sites increased HIF1α-dependent Epo transcription and reduced HIF1α response to SENP1. Epo-Luc and the indicated plasmids were co-transfected into Hep-3B cells. Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments. (C) SUMOylated HIF1α accumulated in SENP1−/− MEF cells, but not in wildtype or SENP2−/−MEF cells after exposure to hypoxia. Wildtype (+/+), SENP1−/−, or SENP2−/− MEF cells were treated with or without hypoxia (1% O2) for 4 hrs as indicated. HIF1α was immunoprecipitated with anti-HIF1α antibody from these cell lysates. The precipitates were immunoblotted (IB) with anti-SUMO-1 antibody (top panel). Asterisk indicates IgG band. (D) SUMOylated HIF1α level was controlled by SENP1 and proteasome-dependent degradation. COS-7 cells were transfected with indicated plasmids and then treated without or with MG132 (10 μM) for 4 hours before harvesting and immunoprecipitated with anti-HIF1α (IP). Bound proteins were detected by anti-HA and anti-HIF1α immunoblotting (IB). Whole-cell lysates (WCL) were immunoblotted (IB) with anti-HA. Asterisk indicates IgG band. (E) SUMOylated HIF1α accumulated in SENP1−/− MEF cells after exposure to hypoxia and undergoes proteasome-dependent degradation. SENP1+/+ or −/− MEF cells were treated by hypoxia (1% O2) and MG132 (10 μM) for 4 hrs as indicated. HIF1α was immunoprecipitated with anti-HIF1α antibody from cell lysates. The precipitates were immunoblotted (IB) with anti-SUMO-1 and HIF1α antibodies. Asterisk indicates IgG band.
Figure 6
Figure 6. VHL is required for degradation of SUMOylated HIF1α
(A) HIF1α ubiquitination was regulated by SUMO-1 and SENP1. COS-7 cells were co-transfected with indicated plasmids and treated with MG132 (10 μM) for 9 hours before harvesting. HIF1α was immunoprecipitated with anti-HIF1α (IP) and bound proteins were detected by anti-HA (top panel), anti-Myc (second panel), and anti-HIF1α immunoblotting (third panel) (IB). Whole-cell lysates (WCL) were immunoblotted (IB) with anti-HA (fourth panel) or anti-Flag (bottom panel) antibodies. Asterisk indicates IgG band. (B) RCC4 or RCC4/VHL cells were treated by hypoxia (1% O2) and/or MG132 (10 μM) for 4 hrs as indicated. HIF1α was immunoprecipitated with anti-HIF1α antibody from cell lysates. The precipitates were immunoblotted (IB) with anti-SUMO-1 or HIF1α antibodies. Asterisk indicates IgG band. (C) VHL bound to SUMOylated HIF1α proline mutant (HIF1α PM) in vivo. COS-7 cells were co-transfected with indicated plasmids and treated without or with MG132 (10 μM) for 4 hrs before harvesting. VHL was immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag (IP) from the nuclear fraction of the transfected cells and bound proteins were detected by anti-HIF1α (top panel), anti-HA (second panel), or anti-Flag immunoblotting (third panel) (IB). HIF1α was also immunoprecipitated with anti-HIF1α (IP) from the nuclear fraction of transfected cells and bound proteins were detected by anti-HA antibody (IB) (fourth panel). Whole-cell lysates (WCL) were immunoblotted (IB) with anti-HIF1α (bottom panel). Asterisk indicates IgG band. (D) VHL specifically bound to SUMOylated HIF1α ODD with proline mutation (GST-ODD (344–698) PM) in vitro. GST-ODD (344–698) PM recombinant protein and SUMOylated GST-ODD (344–698) PM produced by in vitro SUMOylation was incubated with Flag-VHL produced by in vitro translation. After washing and eluting with Flag peptide, the precipitates were immunoblotted with ant-HIF1α (middle panel) or anti-SUMO-1(right panel) antibodies. (E) Mapping of VHL domain that bound to SUMO-1-fused ODD. GST-ODD (344–698) PM and SUMO-1-fused GST-ODD (344–698) PM recombinant proteins were incubated with HA-VHL and its mutant produced by in vitro translation for two hr. The precipitates with glutathione-agarose beads were detected by immunoblotting with ant-HA (top and right panel) or anti-HIF1α antibodies (bottom panel). (F) HIF1α degradation induced by SENP1 silencing was VHL-dependent. RCC4 or RCC4/VHL cells and SENP1-siRNA stable transfected RCC4 or RCC4/VHL cells were treated by hypoxia (1% O2) for 4 hrs as indicated. Cell lysates were detected by immunoblotted with anti-HIF1α or anti-actin antibodies.
Figure 7
Figure 7. SENP1 regulates of HIF1α stability in hypoxia
Hypoxia blocks the activity of PHD, preventing hydroxylation of HIF1α and its subsequent degradation in a VHL- and ubiquitin-dependent manner. On the other hand, hypoxia induces nuclear translocation and SUMOylation of HIF1α, which provides an alternative signal for VHL- and ubiquitin-dependent degradation. SENP1 stabilizes HIF1α by removing the alternative VHL-binding signal.

Comment in

References

    1. Bae SH, Jeong JW, Park JA, Kim SH, Bae MK, Choi SJ, Kim KW. Sumoylation increases HIF-1alpha stability and its transcriptional activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;324:394–400. - PubMed
    1. Brahimi-Horn C, Mazure N, Pouyssegur J. Signalling via the hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha requires multiple posttranslational modifications. Cell Signal. 2005;17:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Bruick RK, McKnight SL. A conserved family of prolyl-4-hydroxylases that modify HIF. Science. 2001;294:1337–1340. - PubMed
    1. Cheng J, Bawa T, Lee P, Gong L, Yeh ET. Role of desumoylation in the development of prostate cancer. Neoplasia. 2006;8:667–676. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng J, Perkins ND, Yeh ET. Differential Regulation of c-Jun-dependent Transcription by SUMO-specific Proteases. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:14492–14498. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources