Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct;73(10):1023-6.

Computed tomographic brain density measurement as a predictor of elevated intracranial pressure in blunt head trauma

Affiliations
  • PMID: 17983073

Computed tomographic brain density measurement as a predictor of elevated intracranial pressure in blunt head trauma

Kenji Inaba et al. Am Surg. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

There are no independent computed tomography (CT) findings predictive of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate brain density measurement on CT as a predictor of elevated ICP or decreased cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). A prospectively collected database of patients with acute traumatic brain injury was used to identify patients who had a brain CT followed within 2 hours by ICP measurement. Blinded reviewers measured mean density in Hounsfield Units (HU) within a 100-mm2 elliptical region at four standardized positions. Brain density measurement was compared for patients with an ICP of 20 or greater versus less than 20 mm Hg and CPP of 70 or greater versus less than 70 mm Hg. During a 2-year period, 47 patients had ICP monitoring after brain CT. Average age was 40 +/- 18 years old; 93.6 per cent were male; mean Injury Severity Score was 25 +/- 10; and Glasgow Coma Scale was 6 +/- 4. There was no difference in brain density measurement for observer 1, ICP less than 20 (26.3 HU) versus ICP 20 or greater (27.4 HU, P = 0.545) or for CPP less than 70 (27.1 HU) versus CPP 70 or greater (26.2, P = 0.624). Similarly, there was no difference for observer 2, ICP less than 20 (26.8 HU) versus ICP 20 or greater (27.4, P = 0.753) and CPP less than 70 (27.6 HU) versus CPP 70 or greater (26.2, P = 0.436). CT-measured brain density does not correlate with elevated ICP or depressed CPP and cannot predict patients with traumatic brain injury who would benefit from invasive ICP monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer