Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall
- PMID: 17983310
- DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1020
Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall
Abstract
Two experiments explored the possibility that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) partially reflect differences in the size of the search set from which items are retrieved. High- and low-WMC individuals were tested in delayed (Experiment 1) and continuous distractor (Experiment 2) free recall with varying list lengths. Across both experiments low-WMC individuals recalled fewer items than high-WMC individuals, recalled more previous list intrusions than high-WMC individuals, and recalled at a slower rate than high-WMC individuals. It is argued that low-WMC individuals' episodic retrieval deficits are partially due to the fact that these individuals search through a larger set of items than high-WMC individuals. Simulations based on a random search model were consistent with these general conclusions.
PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.Memory. 2009 May;17(4):386-96. doi: 10.1080/09658210902802959. Memory. 2009. PMID: 19358013
-
The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: an individual differences analysis of immediate free recall.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):240-7. doi: 10.1037/a0017739. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20053060
-
Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):264-9. doi: 10.1037/a0021324. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21090906
-
[Functioning of memory in subjects with autism].Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):550-6. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.10.010. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Encephale. 2008. PMID: 19081450 Review. French.
-
A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1282-1311. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1220-5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 28108977 Review.
Cited by
-
Value-directed learning: Schematic reward structure facilitates learning.Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1527-1546. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01406-6. Epub 2023 Mar 9. Mem Cognit. 2023. PMID: 36892706 Free PMC article.
-
Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society.Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;19(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015. PMID: 25487706 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unmasking the component-general and component-specific aspects of primary and secondary memory in the immediate free recall task.Mem Cognit. 2018 Apr;46(3):349-360. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0769-1. Mem Cognit. 2018. PMID: 29110210
-
Selective memory disrupted in intra-modal dual-task encoding conditions.Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1453-1472. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01166-1. Epub 2021 Mar 24. Mem Cognit. 2021. PMID: 33763815 Free PMC article.
-
Parietal contributions to visual working memory depend on task difficulty.Front Psychiatry. 2012 Sep 10;3:81. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00081. eCollection 2012. Front Psychiatry. 2012. PMID: 22973241 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources