Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement
- PMID: 17985364
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.3110
Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement
Abstract
In tandem with the rapid development of medical technology, methods for assessing intrarater and interrater reliability or agreement across tools for continuous measurements have become an increasingly important research topic. Thus far, a number of reliability assessment methods have been proposed. Among them, the limits of agreement and repeatability coefficients were found to be the most useful tools for assessing reliability when measurements are on a continuous scale. However, both are considered as descriptive methods. The concepts of consistency or conformity require an equivalence test without which judgment would be subjective. In this paper we will extend the repeatability coefficient approach and propose an equivalence test that can be used to confirm the agreement between two or more measurement tools or assess interrater and intrarater reliability. Using this approach, a formula to calculate sample size will also be suggested and examples will be provided to illustrate the method.
(c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Assessing intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements.Stat Med. 2002 Nov 30;21(22):3431-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.1253. Stat Med. 2002. PMID: 12407682
-
Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.Lymphology. 2007 Mar;40(1):26-34. Lymphology. 2007. PMID: 17539462
-
An examination of reliability in developmental research.J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1995 Jun;16(3):177-82. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1995. PMID: 7560120
-
Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: key concepts, approaches, and applications.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 May-Jun;9(3):330-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jun 12. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013. PMID: 22695215 Review.
-
Modelling patterns of agreement for nominal scales.Stat Med. 2008 Mar 15;27(6):810-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.2945. Stat Med. 2008. PMID: 17634968 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of an Assessment Tool to Measure Healthy Eating in Navajo Children and Their Families.Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Apr 1;7(5):100074. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100074. eCollection 2023 May. Curr Dev Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37215645 Free PMC article.
-
Sample size determination in method comparison and observer variability studies.J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Oct;36(5):1241-1243. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00853-x. Epub 2022 Apr 19. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022. PMID: 35438365
-
Reporting Standards for a Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews.Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 May 22;10(5):334. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10050334. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32456091 Free PMC article. Review.