Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;10(4):309-20.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00455.x.

'Balance' is in the eye of the beholder: providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource

Shenaz Ahmed  1 , Louise Bryant, Jenny Hewison
Affiliations

'Balance' is in the eye of the beholder: providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource

Shenaz Ahmed et al. Health Expect. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: The Antenatal Screening Web Resource (AnSWeR) was designed to support informed prenatal testing choices by providing balanced information about disability, based on the testimonies of disabled people and their families. We were commissioned by the developers to independently evaluate the website. This paper focused on how participants evaluated AnSWeR in terms of providing balanced information.

Setting: West Yorkshire.

Participants: A total of 69 people were drawn from three groups: health professionals, people with personal experience of tested-for conditions (Down's syndrome, cystic fibrosis and spina bifida) and people representing potential users of the resource.

Method: Data were collected via focus groups and electronic questionnaires.

Results: Participants believed that information about the experience of living with the tested-for conditions and terminating a pregnancy for the conditions were important to support informed antenatal testing and termination decisions. However, there were differences in opinion about whether the information about the tested-for conditions was balanced or not. Some people felt that the inclusion of photographs of people with the tested-for conditions introduced biases (both positive and negative). Many participants were also of the opinion that AnSWeR presented insufficient information on termination of an affected pregnancy to support informed choice.

Conclusion: This study highlighted the difficulty of designing 'balanced' information about tested-for conditions and a lack of methodology for doing so. It is suggested that AnSWeR currently provides a counterbalance to other websites that focus on the medical aspects of disability. Its aim to provide 'balanced' information would be aided by increasing the number and range of case studies available on the website.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Responses to the questionnaire from 15 people with special expertise.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Considering 'balance' in information.
    Entwistle V. Entwistle V. Health Expect. 2007 Dec;10(4):307-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00469.x. Health Expect. 2007. PMID: 17986067 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Royal College of Physicians . Prenatal Diagnosis and Genetic Screening: Community and Service Implications. London: Royal College of Physicians, 1989. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nuffield Council on Bioethics . Genetic Screening: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Foundation, 1993.
    1. General Medical Council . Seeking Patients’ Consent: The Ethical Considerations. London: GMC, 1999.
    1. Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. What constitutes ‘balanced’ information in the practitioners’ portrayals of Down’s syndrome?. Midwifery, 2002; 18: 230–237. - PubMed
    1. Murray J, Cuckle H, Sehmi I et al. Quality of written information used in Down syndrome screening. Prenatal Diagnosis, 2001; 21: 138–142. - PubMed