Comparison of multiple drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention and surgical revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: one-year clinical results and total treatment costs
- PMID: 17986722
Comparison of multiple drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention and surgical revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: one-year clinical results and total treatment costs
Abstract
Purpose: Consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with multiple drug-eluting-stent (DES) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (111 patients) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (95 patients) on the basis of clinico-anatomical judgment were examined to investigate mediumterm clinical results and initial and total costs.
Methods: Clinical and procedural characteristics, duration of hospital stay, initial and total costs and 12-month follow-up events were considered in both groups.
Results: Previous revascularization procedures and acute coronary syndromes were more frequent in the PCI group, while triple-vessel and left main disease occurred more often in the CABG group. The mean number of treated vessels in multiple DES PCI was 2.7/patient, with 2.8 DES/patient. Complete revascularization was achieved in 70% of cases. Inhospital events were postprocedural non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction in 5.4%, and 2 retroperitoneal hemorrhages. CABG was performed with a mean of 3.9 grafts/patient; 16 patients (17%) had early complications; mean hospital stay was significantly longer than for the PCI patients (23.5 +/- 10 vs. 5.3 +/- 3 days; p < 0.001). Twelve-month total mortality and acute myocardial infarction incidents were similar, while target vessel revascularization was significantly more frequent in the PCI group (12.6% PCI vs. 2.1% CABG; p < 0.001); cumulative major adverse cardiac events were not significantly different (15.3% PCI vs. 9.5% CABG; p = 0.271). Initial and final costs were lower for multivessel PCI with DES (20,050 +/- 2,702 for CABG vs. 10,214 +/- 4,184 for PCI; p < 0.001), but not completely covered by current DRG reimbursement.
Conclusions: Multiple DES PCI showed good earlyand medium-term results with substantially lower costs than CABG.
Comment in
-
Multivessel PCI versus CABG: one-year outcomes and cost analysis.J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 Nov;19(11):476-7. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17986723 Review. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Circulation. 2014. PMID: 25085960 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the FREEDOM trial.Circulation. 2013 Feb 19;127(7):820-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.147488. Epub 2012 Dec 31. Circulation. 2013. PMID: 23277307 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease compared to coronary artery bypass surgery five-years after intervention.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec 1;84(7):1029-39. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25397. Epub 2014 Feb 1. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24403120 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30025574
-
Comparing cost aspects of coronary artery bypass graft surgery with coronary artery stenting.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2012 Oct;53(5):641-50. Epub 2012 Jan 17. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2012. PMID: 22252542 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost of elective percutaneous coronary intervention in Malaysia: a multicentre cross-sectional costing study.BMJ Open. 2017 May 28;7(5):e014307. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014307. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28552843 Free PMC article.
-
Stratification of coronary artery disease patients for revascularization procedure based on estimating adverse effects.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Feb 14;15:9. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0131-0. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015. PMID: 25889930 Free PMC article.
-
The comparative efficacy of percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization in 2009: a review.Tex Heart Inst J. 2009;36(5):375-86. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009. PMID: 19876412 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of the treatment practice and hospitalization cost of percutaneous coronary intervention between a teaching hospital and a general hospital in Malaysia: A cross sectional study.PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0184410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184410. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28873473 Free PMC article.
-
[Health-economic modeling on the use of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in coronary heart disease].Herz. 2009 May;34(3):231-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-009-3182-0. Epub 2009 May 16. Herz. 2009. PMID: 19444408 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous