Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov 7;2(11):e1128.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001128.

Oxytocin increases generosity in humans

Affiliations

Oxytocin increases generosity in humans

Paul J Zak et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Human beings routinely help strangers at costs to themselves. Sometimes the help offered is generous-offering more than the other expects. The proximate mechanisms supporting generosity are not well-understood, but several lines of research suggest a role for empathy. In this study, participants were infused with 40 IU oxytocin (OT) or placebo and engaged in a blinded, one-shot decision on how to split a sum of money with a stranger that could be rejected. Those on OT were 80% more generous than those given a placebo. OT had no effect on a unilateral monetary transfer task dissociating generosity from altruism. OT and altruism together predicted almost half the interpersonal variation in generosity. Notably, OT had twofold larger impact on generosity compared to altruism. This indicates that generosity is associated with both altruism as well as an emotional identification with another person.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Oxytocin and generosity.
Mean DM1 generosity (DM1 UG offer minus average minimum acceptable offer) for those receiving OT or placebo. Generosity is 80% larger in the OT group (p = 0.005, N = 68). The increased generosity is not due to altruism as OT infusion in a task designed to isolated altruism showed no impact relative to placebo (p = 0.51, N = 68).

References

    1. Giving USA. The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2006. Giving Institute; 2006.
    1. Brooks AS, editor. Gifts of Time and Money: The Role of Charity in America's Communities. Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield; 2005. p. 240.
    1. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol. 1964;7:1–16. - PubMed
    1. Grafen A. Detecting kin selection at work using inclusive fitness. Proc Biol Sci. 2007;7274:713–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schervish PG, Havens JJ. The Boston area diary study and the moral citizenship of care. Voluntas: Int J Vol Nonprofit Org. 2002;13:47–71.

Publication types